Back

Cell-type Plasticity Supports Behavioral Adaptations at the Water-to-Land Interface

Matheson, A. M.; Woych, J.; Zinga, T. G.; Spollen, N.; Policarpo, M.; Gattoni, G.; Graham, G.; Geiger, L. T.; Ortega-Gurrola, A.; Jaeger, E. C.; Salzburger, W.; Tosches, M. A.

2026-07-25 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.25.740661 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Animals inhabiting aquatic or terrestrial habitats experience different constraints on their physiology and locomotion, and are exposed to fundamentally different sensory environments. Across evolutionary timescales, most species have adapted to live exclusively either in water or on land. Newts are among the vertebrates that defy this rule and split their adult lives between freshwater ponds and terrestrial habitats. In these amphibians, transitions across environments cause remarkable phenotypic plasticity in their body morphology. But whether and how the nervous system and behavior also adapt to these environmental changes remains poorly explored. Here, we establish the Iberian ribbed newt Pleurodeles waltl as a new model to study the neurobiology of environmental plasticity in a vertebrate. We first show that experimental transitions between aquatic and terrestrial laboratory settings recapitulate morphological changes observed in the wild. Furthermore, aquatic and terrestrial newts display plasticity in sensory and motor behaviors, including differences in walking gait and odor responsiveness. In the olfactory system, the transition from water to land involves a profound remodeling of the nasal epithelium, including reversible transcriptomic changes in secretory and support cells, and an increase of neurogenesis. Together, our findings reveal how plasticity of specific cell types in the nervous system supports behavioral adaptations across environments. More broadly, this work establishes newts as a model to study the functional constraints and convergent adaptations that may have shaped the evolution of vertebrate nervous systems in water and on land.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.