Assessing MRI Biomarker Repeatability to Guide Individualized TMS Treatment in Psychiatry
Tavakoli, H.; Rostami, R.; Fallahi, A.; Tabatabaei, N.; Nazem-Zadeh, M.-R.
Show abstract
Background: MRI has increasingly been explored as a biomarker for detecting structural and functional brain changes. For clinical decision-making, it is crucial to validate observed changes in MRI indices at the individual level. The uncertainty in longitudinal MRI indices can be quantified using the repeatability coefficient (RC). Methods: Twenty healthy controls (10 males, 10 females) underwent two test-retest sessions of structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) on the same day, separated by a 30-minute interval. RC values and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for subcortical volumes, cortical thickness, and within-network functional connectivity. Additionally, 33 patients with mental health disorders underwent MRI before and after 20 sessions of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Percentage changes in MRI-derived indices were assessed at the individual level, with changes exceeding the RC threshold considered indicative of true change beyond measurement uncertainty. Results: The RC showed measurement variability in subcortical volumetric in the range of 8% to 17.5% for caudate and left amygdala, respectively. For cortical thickness, the RC was measured between 3.5% and 16.5% for the left occipital pole and the left temporal pole, respectively. The RC% for fractional anisotropy (FA) measures were variable between 11.3% (the left middle cingulum) and 62.9% (the right anterior cingulum). For within-network connectivity, the RC was measured in a range of 9.7% and 29.4% for sensorimotor and visual networks, respectively. TMS-treated patients exhibited no changes beyond the RC in almost all subcortical volumes and within-network connectivity. The most frequent changes beyond the uncertainty were observed in FA measures, particularly in the posterior cingulum, where 17 out of 23 patients exhibited clinically meaningful alterations. Conclusion: Structural brain features extracted from MRI demonstrated high reliability. Among all measures, FA, reflecting white matter integrity, was most sensitive in detecting neural changes following TMS, highlighting its potential utility as a treatment-responsive biomarker.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multimodal fusion of structural and functional brain imaging in depression using linked independent component analysis 97%
- Robust hierarchically organized whole-brain patterns of dysconnectivity in schizophrenia spectrum disorders observed after Personalized Intrinsic Network Topography 96%
- Maximizing Dissimilarity in Resting State detects Heterogeneous Subtypes in Healthy population associated with High Substance-Use and Problems in Antisocial Personality 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analyzing Fractal Dimension in Electroconvulsive Therapy: Unraveling Complexity in Structural and Functional Neuroimaging 96%
- Effects of phase encoding direction on test-retest reliability of human functional connectome 96%
- Reproducibility Assessment of Neuromelanin-Sensitive Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocols for Region-of-Interest and Voxelwise Analyses 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Global signal regression reduces connectivity patterns related to physiological signals and does not alter EEG-derived connectivity 95%
- Structural brain imaging predicts individual-level task activation maps using deep learning 94%
- Dynamic off-resonance correction improves functional image analysis in fMRI of awake behaving non-human primates 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A comparison of fMRI presurgical mapping techniques with intraoperative brain mapping-based validation 95%
- Normative trajectories of R1, R2* and magnetic susceptibility in basal ganglia on healthy ageing 95%
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbosacral cord during a lower extremity motor task 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.