Dynamic structural changes and inhibition of insect delta and epsilon glutathione S-transferases by ethacrynic acid and permethrin
Sharma, M.; Qin, S.; Thibodeaux, C. J.; Dastmalchi, M.
Show abstract
Insect glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) play critical roles in xenobiotic detoxification and insecticide resistance, making them promising targets for selective pest-control strategies. Here, we performed a comparative analysis of GSTs representing multiple classes from beneficial insects, agricultural pests, and disease vectors. We found significant isozyme-specific variations in catalytic activity, stability, and conformational dynamics, notably, in relation to inhibition by the commercial chemical agents, ethacrynic acid (ECA) and permethrin (PER). Sequence similarity network analysis revealed distinct clustering of major GST classes and further highlighted the relatively recent evolutionary divergence of the insect-specific delta and epsilon classes. Structural modeling revealed highly conserved glutathione-binding sites (G-site), but substantial variation in the hydrophobic substrate-binding regions (H-site). Further, epsilon-class GSTs exhibited 4 helices oriented approximately 10{degrees} closer to the glutathione-binding site than delta enzymes, suggesting differences in active-site architecture. Steady-state kinetic analyses using 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB) demonstrated that epsilon GSTs are generally more catalytically efficient. Inhibition studies revealed that ECA acts as a potent mixed-type inhibitor of delta-class GSTs, reducing catalytic efficiency by up to 56-fold, whereas PER produced weaker and more species-dependent effects. Notably, ECA binding strongly stabilized delta GSTs, as measured by differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF) and induced a selective rigidification of the 3/4 linker region and active-site motifs, as observed by hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS). Collectively, these findings demonstrate the importance of analyzing the conformational dynamics mediating insect GST inhibition and provide a framework for exploiting isozyme-specific structural features in the design of next-generation selective insecticides.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Harnessing Protein Language Model for Structure-Based Discovery of Highly Efficient and Robust PET Hydrolases 94%
- An iron (II) dependent oxygenase performs the last missing step of plant lysine catabolism 93%
- Iron-sensing and redox properties of the hemerythrin-like domains of Arabidopsis BRUTUS and BRUTUS-LIKE2 proteins 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Kinetic Characterization and Computational Modeling of the Escherichia coli Heptosyltransferase II: Exploring the Role of Protein Dynamics in Catalysis for a GT-B Glycosyltransferase 93%
- Analysis of the high-order conformational changes in glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase induced by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, adenosine triphosphate, and oxidants 93%
- Structure and Mechanism of Avermitilol Synthase, a Sesquiterpene Cyclase that Generates a Highly Strained 6-6-3 Tricyclic Alcohol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- An ancient lysozyme in placozoans participates in acidic extracellular digestion 93%
- Structural and Functional Analyses Explain Pea KAI2 Receptor Diversity and Reveal Stereoselective Catalysis During Signal Perception 93%
- Rational engineering of an elevator-type metal transporter ZIP8 reveals a conditional selectivity filter critically involved in determining substrate specificity 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Structure and mechanism of potent bifunctional β-lactam- and homoserine lactone-degrading enzymes from marine microorganisms 93%
- Confrontation of AlphaFold2 models with cryo-EM and crystal structures enlightens alternate geometries of the CYP102A1 multidomain protein 93%
- Discovery of Aminoglycosides as First in Class, Nanomolar Inhibitors of Heptosyltransferase I 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.