A geometric-to-neural cascade for cerebral microbleed detection in susceptibility-weighted MRI
Bogdanov, S.; Rudravaram, G.; Saunders, A. M.; Kim, M. E.; LeFevre, J.; Charles, J.; Jain, S.; Schrag, M. S.; Landman, B. A.
Show abstract
Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are established imaging biomarkers of cerebral small vessel disease and are a defining feature of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), yet their automated detection in susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) remains challenging due to high false-positive rates from vessel cross-sections, iron and calcium deposits, and other hypointense mimics. We present a fully automated, three-stage cascade pipeline that combines subject-adaptive unsupervised candidate generation with two successive lightweight 3D ResNet classifiers, trained with only human-in-the-loop quality-assurance (QA) labels (yes/no per candidate) rather than dense voxel-wise segmentation masks. The candidate generation stage is performed by fitting a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) to each subjects SWI intensity histogram to define an adaptive low-intensity threshold, followed by anatomical masking to exclude physiologically irrelevant regions (image edges, ventricles/CSF/choroid plexus, and cerebellum), and filters candidates by size and sphericity. The model was trained and evaluated across a nested 3x5-fold cross-validation on N = 30 subjects from a publicly available labeled microbleed dataset and a CAA cohort (11,424 CMB candidate lesions) with data augmentation during training. Stage A classifies all geometric candidates as CMB or non-CMB and Stage B refines the predicted positives to suppress false positives (cascade AUC = 0.9587, sensitivity = 0.712, specificity = 0.975, PPV = 0.676, F1 = 0.693). The cascade reduces Stage A false positives by 76.8% (888/1,157 false positives eliminated) while retaining competitive sensitivity. Inference was performed on 141 SWI scans, detecting a mean 40.3 CMBs per scan and being preferred for use in 85% of high CMB cases, as evaluated by a blinded neurologist. The inference pipeline outputs binary CMB segmentation NIfTI images and radiologist-ready QA visualizations.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Generation of Cerebral Blood Flow Maps Using Deep Learning and Multiple Delay Arterial Spin-Labelled MRI 97%
- Prospective Motion Correction and Automatic Segmentation of Penetrating Arteries in Phase Contrast MRI at 7 T 96%
- QSMxT: Robust Masking and Artefact Reduction for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Anatomy-guided, modality-agnostic segmentation of neuroimaging abnormalities 96%
- OpenMAP-T1: A Rapid Deep Learning Approach to Parcellate 280 Anatomical Regions to Cover the Whole Brain 96%
- WMH-DualTasker: A weakly-supervised deep learning model for automated white matter hyperintensities segmentation and visual rating prediction 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- VesselBoost: A Python Toolbox for Small Blood Vessel Segmentation in Human Magnetic Resonance Angiography Data 97%
- QRATER: a collaborative and centralized imaging quality control web-based application. 94%
- Longitudinal deformation based morphometry pipeline to study neuroanatomical differences in structural MRI based on SyN unbiased templates 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A preliminary attempt to harmonize using physics-constrained deep neural networks for multisite and multiscanner MRI datasets (PhyCHarm) 96%
- Tensor Image Registration Library: Automated Deformable Registration of Stand-Alone Histology Images to Whole-Brain Post-Mortem MRI Data 96%
- Automated joint skull-stripping and segmentation with Multi-Task U-Net in large mouse brain MRI databases 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.