Back

A Preparation-Free Mixture-of-Experts Framework for Protein-Ligand Affinity Prediction

Bao, H.; Dong, S.

2026-07-28 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.07.24.740495 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Protein-ligand affinity (PLA) prediction is central to AI-driven drug discovery, but precise interaction-based methods require costly conformation preparation and data encoding, limiting their throughput. To reconcile accuracy with efficiency, we first investigate whether pre-trained molecular representation models can replace complex encoders. A unified and diverse assessment of sequence-, graph-, and image-based representations reveals both strong overall performance and family-wise variability, delivering the first practical guidance for encoder selection in PLA tasks. Next, to achieve high computational efficiency without sacrificing expressiveness, we adopt the mixture-of-experts (MoE) strategy from large language models. Systematic ablation studies uncover key design principles for deploying MoE in molecular prediction. The resulting model, HydrAffinity, is an interaction-free, dynamic sparse model that uses pre-trained encoders and MoE for parameter-efficient learning. It outperforms all interaction-free methods and matches state-of-the-art interaction-based methods on CASF-2016. Routing analysis confirms that MoE develops distinct, family-specific activation patterns, providing interpretable evidence of dynamic parameterization across protein classes. Zero-shot tests on DUDE-Z and LIT-PCBA further show strong EF5% performance, making HydrAffinity a practical, scalable solution acting as an effective early-stage pre-filter. Graphic abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=79 SRC="FIGDIR/small/740495v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (26K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@fb7a56org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1cc154org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d874eeorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e4db22_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.