Kin discrimination in plants: competitive ability over kinship response
Mazal, L.; Malagoli, P.; Bourceret, A.; Selosse, M.-A.; Corenblit, D.; Till-bottraud, I.; Fumanal, B.
Show abstract
Numerous studies on plant-plant interactions aim to distinguish positive from negative effects, especially among related individuals. Most studies interpret a reduction in biomass when grown with related individuals as kin recognition. However, these interactions can shift from positive to negative depending on environmental or biotic factors. We investigated these interactions in Black poplar (Populus nigra L.), a riparian tree species growing in high densities and stressful habitats, by examining the effects of relatedness and water deficit during early developmental stages. We set up two experiments where seedlings from four kin groups were competing with related or unrelated individuals, in well-watered versus water deficit environment, and studied their response through growth, root nitrogen uptake and mycorrhizal diversity. The four kin groups exhibit similar intrinsic growth capacities. However, for two kin groups, we found differences in competitive ability. Thus, we found that individuals responded differently depending on whether they were grown with related or unrelated individuals. Water deficit did not change the outcomes of interactions. Differences in competitive ability between kin groups was the most parsimonious interpretation, thus eliminating kin recognition as an explanation. Our study suggests that results obtained in general in kin studies must be carefully analyzed and that alternative interpretations, such as differences in competitive ability, must be tested before conclude wrongly to kin recognition. Our study also suggests that mycorrhizal communities develop differently according to the kin groups considered and can potentially have impacts on the growth of individuals.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Intraspecific interactions in the annual legume Medicago minima are shaped by both genetic variation for competitive ability and reduced competition among kin. 97%
- Legume plant defenses and nutrients mediate indirect interactions between soil rhizobia and chewing herbivores 95%
- Using spatially-explicit plant competition models to optimise crop productivity in intercropped systems 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assembly history modulates vertical root distribution in a grassland experiment 94%
- Soil microbe-induced plant resistance alters aphid inter-genotypic competition leading to rapid evolution with consequences for plant growth and aphid abundance 94%
- Simple attributes predict the importance of plants as hosts to the richness of fungi and arthropods 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Soil variation response is mediated by growth trajectories rather than functional traits in a widespread pioneer Neotropical tree 94%
- Intra and inter-annual climatic conditions have stronger effect than grazing intensity on root growth of permanent grasslands 93%
- Bacterial pathogens dynamic during multi-species infections 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Silicon supplementation and jasmonate activation synergistically increase phenolic defences against a legume herbivore 95%
- Transgenerational coexistence history attenuates negative direct interactions and strengthens facilitation 94%
- Functional traits and soil water availability shape competitive interactions in a diploid-polyploid complex 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Microhabitat and ectomycorrhizal effects on the establishment, growth and survival of Quercus ilex L. seedlings under drought 95%
- Verification of our empirical understanding of the physiology and ecology of two contrasting plantation species using a trait database 94%
- Elevated CO2 and warming change the nutrient status and use efficiency of Panicum maximum Jacq. 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.