Global structure of new relational knowledge networks is represented in retrosplenial complex, and node-distance in hippocampus
Feld, G. B.; Fernandez Velasco, P.; Gahnstrom, C. J.; Bernard, M.; Mian, Q.; Garvert, M. M.; Dick, F.; Gerchen, M. F.; Spiers, H. J.
Show abstract
Much of our knowledge is structured in networks, but how the brain represents such networks remains unclear. In most nested knowledge structures a subset of the nodes will be highly connected to other nodes in the network. High levels of connection can exist either locally (high degree centrality) or at a global level (high closeness/betweenness centrality). Here, we explored how the human brain represents network structure using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and a novel learning paradigm. During training, participants learned the transition structure for travel between a set of fictious partially connected alien planets. Despite encountering only individual connections, participants choices indicated they could infer the broader network structure. Next day, they viewed each stimulus during a cover task while undergoing fMRI. Representational-similarity analysis showed that shortest-path distances within the learned graph were encoded in the posterior hippocampus and right retrosplenial complex, whereas global connectivity (closeness/ betweenness centrality) was represented in the left retrosplenial complex. These findings extend the view that brain networks associated with spatial navigation also process abstract relational knowledge using principles akin to mapping physical space. The results are also consistent with proposals that the hippocampus represents distance information and that the retrosplenial cortex acts as hub for integrating recently acquired knowledge.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Overlapping attentional networks yield divergent behavioral predictions across tasks: Neuromarkers for diffuse and focused attention? 96%
- Spatial task instructions and global activation trends influence functional modularity in the cortical reach network 96%
- Structural-Functional Brain Network Coupling Predicts Human Cognitive Ability 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Metastable neural dynamics underlies cognitive performance across multiple behavioural paradigms 96%
- Network and State Specificity in Connectivity-Based Predictions of Individual Behavior 95%
- Relational integration demands are tracked by temporally delayed neural representations in alpha and beta rhythms within higher-order cortical networks 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.