Back

Sex and menstrual cycle differences in the mood-activity association should inform cycle-aware digital phenotyping

Delray, K.; Zeitler, J. K.; Hayes, J. F.; Kandola, A.; Keay, N.; Evans, R. J.

2026-07-27 health informatics
10.64898/2026.07.24.26358675 medRxiv
Show abstract

Passive physical activity is increasingly used as a digital-phenotyping proxy for mood, assuming a stable relationship across people and time. We tested this assumption using daily mood and activity data from 1,072 individuals (121 women, 951 men; 13,909 person-days) in the Juli app. The within-person activity-mood association was stronger in women than men (slope difference -0.194, p = 0.019). Within women, it varied across the menstrual cycle (p = 0.022): absent in the early luteal phase, significant in all other phases, and largest in the late luteal phase (+0.46). A male pseudo-cycle control showed no such modulation (p = 0.974), confirming the effect is cycle-specific rather than a general temporal pattern. Accounting for cycle phase improved out-of-sample mood prediction in women in 75% of cross-validation splits. Digital phenotyping should account for sex and menstrual cycle phase to avoid biased predictions and enable personalized recommendations for women.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.