Back

Ligand-Specified Signaling Efficacy Defined by Unique Transitions in G Protein Conformations

Ye, L.; Wang, X.; Sun, W.; Hays, N.; Wang, P.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Y.

2026-07-25 biophysics
10.64898/2026.07.23.740425 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Despite decades of research into the signaling efficacy of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), including the resolution of numerous receptor structures in complex with nucleotide-free G proteins1,2, mini-G proteins3,4, and G protein carboxyl-terminal peptides5-7, our understanding of the underlying mechanisms remains elusive, because a fluidic, dynamic view of the conformational transitions during GPCR activation is still missing. Benefiting from its supersensitization to microenvironmental changes, recent advances in 19F-quantitative NMR (19F-qNMR)8 enable the dissection and quantification of the conformational energy landscape and dynamics of receptors and their signaling partners, offering new perspectives for deciphering the signaling machinery through a novel lens. Herein, we first established a 3-state model of Gs conformational landscape and then quantitatively investigated the conformational transitions and dynamics of Gs proteins in response to different ligand-bound receptors. Our research demonstrated that Gs substates are not only differentially populated in a ligand-dependent manner but also undergo distinct conformational-cycling kinetics across sub-states in response to different ligand bindings. These discoveries enable us to propose a novel GPCR model that integrates quantitative G protein conformational dynamics at the atomic level to explain GPCR pharmacological efficacy, emphasizing that unique equilibrium and transitions of G protein conformational states in response to ligands are critical determinants of signaling specificity.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.