Multimodal Evidence for the Effectiveness of a Digital Behaviour Change Platform: Behavioural, Biomarker, and EEG Outcomes in University Students
Dauphine, R.; Rocha Hammerstrom, M.; Krigolson, O. E.
Show abstract
Digital behaviour change interventions have emerged as a promising approach for improving health, well-being, and performance, yet relatively few studies have evaluated their effects using objective biological and neurophysiological measures. The present study examined the effectiveness of Autonomic, a neuroscience-informed digital coaching platform designed to improve student well-being through personalized behavioural interventions targeting sleep, stress, mood, energy, and focus. Thirty university students engaged with the platform for ten weeks and completed behavioural assessments, biomarker collection, and electroencephalographic (EEG) testing at baseline, five weeks, and ten weeks. Behavioural outcomes included self-reported ratings of focus, energy, sleep, mood, and stress. Biological measures included salivary cortisol and tear fluid dopamine concentrations. EEG assessments included resting-state recordings, frontal theta activity during a working memory task, and N200/P300 event-related potentials during a visual oddball task. Significant improvements were observed in self-reported focus, energy, and sleep quality across the intervention. Electrophysiological measures demonstrated reduced frontal theta power during working memory and shorter P300 latencies during attentional processing, consistent with more efficient cognitive processing following the intervention. Although cortisol, dopamine, and resting-state EEG measures did not reach statistical significance, all exhibited changes in the predicted direction. Collectively, these findings provide converging behavioural, biological, and neurophysiological evidence supporting the effectiveness of Autonomic. More broadly, the study demonstrates the value of combining objective biomarkers and EEG with traditional behavioural assessments when evaluating digital behaviour change interventions and highlights the potential of neuroscience-informed coaching platforms to improve health, well-being, and cognitive functioning in university students.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- EEG-based clusters differentiate psychological distress, sleep quality and cognitive function in adolescents 95%
- Alpha and Beta Oscillations Mediate the Effect of Motivation on Neural Coding of Cognitive Flexibility 93%
- Dissociating the effect of reward uncertainty and timing uncertainty on neural indices of reward prediction errors: A reward positivity (RewP) event-related potential (ERP) study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural sensitivity to the heartbeat is modulated by spontaneous fluctuations in affect arousal during spontaneous thought 95%
- Decreased alertness reconfigures cognitive control networks 95%
- Mind Wandering During Implicit Learning Is Associated With Increased Periodic Eeg Activity And Improved Extraction Of Hidden Probabilistic Patterns 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Developmental changes in individual alpha frequency: Recording EEG data during public engagement events 96%
- Characterising time-on-task effects on oscillatory and aperiodic EEG components and their co-variation with visual task performance. 93%
- 40 Hz Audiovisual Stimulation Improves Sustained Attention and Related Brain Oscillations 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Measure of Event-Related Potentials (ERP) Indices of Motivation During Cycling 95%
- Low Physiological Arousal in Mental Fatigue: Analysis of Heart Rate Variability during Time-on-task, Recovery, and Reactivity 95%
- Augmenting complex and dynamic performance through mindfulness-based cognitive training: an evaluation of training adherence, trait mindfulness, personality and resting-state EEG. 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.