Ontology-guided harmonization enables unified discovery of public metabolomics studies within and across repositories
Banerjee, S.; Jalan, P.; Chinhara, R.; Kalle, C.; Wangikar, P.; Jadhav, K.
Show abstract
Public metabolomics repositories contain thousands of studies, but differences in metadata structure, vocabulary, and repository-specific terms still limit reliable search, comparison, and reuse within and across databases. Here we present HARMONY, an ontology-based framework and web platform that harmonizes study-level metadata and metabolite information across Metabolomics Workbench and MetaboLights studies. HARMONY resolves eight biological and analytical metadata nodes, including species, sample source, disease, analytical technique, separation method, ion polarity, ionization source, and mass analyzer type, while preserving the original deposited terms as evidence. A ninth node, metabolite identity, maps metabolite entities to RefMet across both repositories. HARMONY uses a two-step workflow: Multi-source extraction retrieves records missed by single-field lookups, and ontology mapping then converts repository-specific labels into shared query terms, substantially closing the cross-repository retrieval gap relative to raw matching. Across the full corpus, HARMONY increased cross-repository retrievability from 75.5% to 89.6%, yielding thousands of study-node retrievals and reconnecting studies that raw-text search would have left unreachable within their own repositories. Approximately 91% of Metabolomics Workbench and 85% of MetaboLights studies had at least six of the eight nodes harmonized. The resulting platform, available at https://omicsinharmony.in, supports ontology-aware search, metadata filtering, within- and cross-repository study comparison, and metabolite-level querying, with retrieval backed by machine learning encoders that map study metadata into shared representations of biological and analytical context. HARMONY provides the metabolomics community with a shared, traceable search interface for study discovery and comparison within and across public repositories.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- TidyMass2: Advancing LC-MS Untargeted Metabolomics Through Metabolite Origin Inference and Metabolic Feature-based Functional Module Analysis 95%
- LEOPARD: missing view completion for multi-timepoints omics data via representation disentanglement and temporal knowledge transfer 94%
- Sequence-to-sequence translation from mass spectra to peptides with a transformer model 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- BugSigDB: accelerating microbiome research through systematic comparison to published microbial signatures 93%
- Algorithmic Learning for Auto-deconvolution of GC-MS Data to Enable Molecular Networking within GNPS. 92%
- Classes for the masses: Systematic classification of unknowns using fragmentation spectra 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Correcting batch effects in large-scale multiomic studies using a reference-material-based ratio method 93%
- DEMINERS enables clinical metagenomics and comparative transcriptomic analysis by increasing throughput and accuracy of nanopore direct RNA sequencing 92%
- Multi-omics analysis reveals the molecular response to heat stress in a "red tide" dinoflagellate 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.