Back

Routine FFPE sections support clinically compatible single-nucleus transcriptomics across six human cancer types

Wouters, J.; Bertorello, J.; Gaillard, M.; Simon, B.; Gastineau, S.; Roehrig, A.; Dupont-Roc, M.; Amblard, E.; Pupo, A.; Yu, H.; Blay, J.-Y.; Guerin, C.; Nebot Bral, L.; Vincent Salomon, A.; Verlingue, L.; Xylina, E.; Cabel, L.; Ross, J.; Miller, V.; Letouze, E.; Vallot, C.

2026-07-24 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.07.23.740343 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Tumor cellular composition--including malignant cell states, immune populations, and stromal populations--is increasingly recognized as a determinant of therapeutic response and resistance to anti-cancer agents, yet comprehensive cellular profiling remains largely confined to research settings. Here, we present a clinically compatible sample-to-report workflow for tumor composition profiling from routine formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) clinical specimens. By combining low-input single-nucleus RNA sequencing with foundation model- based automated cell annotation, this workflow enables prospective sample-by-sample analysis without dedicated research material or cohort-based processing. Across 116 clinical specimens representing six cancer types, we generated reproducible measurements of cellular composition and cell-type-specific gene expression, demonstrated high technical reproducibility, and showed concordance with pathological assessment of immune infiltration. The workflow was similarly applicable to archival FFPE material and ultra-low-input biopsy specimens. Together, these findings establish a practical framework for routine single-cell profiling from standard pathology specimens and open the perspective of prospective evaluation of cellular composition as a clinical biomarker in precision oncology.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.