Recombination on 'non-recombining' sex chromosomes: empirical insights from the blackspotted stickleback
Liu, Z.; Wachała, K.; Peischl, S.; Cheng, C.; Kirkpatrick, M.; Peichel, C. L.; Jeffries, D. L.
Show abstract
One hallmark of sex chromosome evolution is recombination suppression driven by inversions. The resulting non-recombining sex-linked regions accumulate deleterious mutations and functionally degenerate. The question therefore arises: why does selection not favor the reestablishment of recombination? Two (non-exclusive) explanations for this have been proposed: 1) selection to maintain linkage between the Primary Sex Determination Locus (PSDL) and sexually antagonistic loci - loci with alleles that are beneficial to one sex but detrimental to the other; and 2) the rarity of reversions - structural mutations that reverse the inversion that initially suppressed recombination. Empirical perspectives are sorely needed to evaluate the relevance of these models. Here, we characterised the intermediate stages of sex chromosome evolution in the blackspotted stickleback (Gasterosteus wheatlandi). We generated high-quality, phased assemblies and annotations for the X and Y chromosomes, as well as population-level sequencing. Using these data, we inferred distinct recombination loss events and their associated inversions. Most significantly, we find support from multiple lines of evidence for a [~]2 Mb recombination event that likely occurred via double crossover within an existing non-recombining inversion. This result highlights that rare recombination can occur within sex-linked inversions. Simulations suggest that such histories of gene flux may allow for a novel empirical framework, adapted from work on autosomal inversions, to infer evolutionary processes at work within sex-linked non-recombining regions and distinguish between models to explain the maintenance of recombination suppression on sex chromosomes. Significance StatementSex chromosomes have evolved countless times across eukaryotes and often lose the ability to recombine, causing them to degenerate over time. Why then, does recombination not restart to purge harmful mutations? By generating a high-quality genome assembly of the blackspotted stickleback, we discovered the strong empirical evidence of a sex chromosome undergoing a double-crossover event within a "non-recombining" region, which reset the degenerative process. This finding challenges the view that sex chromosome decay is a one-way street. Furthermore, using forward evolutionary simulations, we demonstrate that the genetic signatures left by such events could help identify the selective forces acting within non-recombining sex chromosomes, thereby explaining the maintenance of recombination suppression.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Single cell RNA-sequencing reveals no evidence for meiotic sex chromosome inactivation in the threespine stickleback fish 96%
- Heterozygous Inversion Breakpoints Suppress Meiotic Crossovers by Altering Recombination Repair Outcomes 95%
- Hybridization promotes asexual reproduction in Caenorhabditis nematodes 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Recent evolution of a maternally-acting sex-determining supergene in a fly with single-sex broods 98%
- Chromosome fusion affects genetic diversity and evolutionary turnover of functional loci, but consistently depends on chromosome size 97%
- Genetic differentiation is constrained to chromosomal inversions and putative centromeres in locally adapted populations with higher gene flow 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Allele frequency dynamics under sex-biased demography and sex-specific inheritance in a pedigreed jay population 96%
- A cosmopolitan inversion drives seasonal adaptation in overwintering Drosophila 96%
- Rapid evolution at the telomere: transposable element dynamics at an intrinsically unstable locus 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.