Back

Spaceland: Histology-Guided Reconstruction of High-Resolution Whole-Organ 3D Molecular Atlases from Sparse Spatial Transcriptomics

Xu, F.; Zhuang, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Ying, B.; Hou, N.; Lin, W.; Wang, L.; Yang, C.; song, j.

2026-07-27 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.07.23.739686 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Reconstructing whole organs in three-dimensional molecular detail is a key step toward building virtual organs for modeling tissue organization, disease progression and drug perturbation responses. However, high-resolution whole-organ spatial transcriptomic profiling remains impractical, forcing a trade-off between reconstruction fidelity and sampling density. Here, we introduce Spaceland, a morphology-guided framework that reconstructs continuous, high-resolution 3D molecular landscapes from sparsely sampled spatial transcriptomic sections and serial H&E histology. Spaceland formulates this task as learning continuous gene-expression fields within a morphology-informed histological space. It constructs a dense 3D morphological scaffold by optical-flow interpolation of foundation model-derived H&E representations and decodes sparse spot-level transcriptomic measurements onto an 8 m histology-aligned grid. Across mouse olfactory bulb, mouse hemibrain and spatiotemporal planarian regeneration, Spaceland generalized across platforms, tissue scales and biological contexts. In mouse benchmarks, Spaceland bridged 400 m molecular gaps, resolved sub-spot organization, outperformed ST-based interpolation and 2D H&E-based prediction methods, and remained robust with 160-320 m H&E intervals. In planarian regeneration, it enabled time-resolved whole-organism analysis from only four Visium sections per stage, revealing dynamic neoblast-neural spatial remodeling. Together, Spaceland shifts 3D molecular atlas construction from exhaustive experimental sampling toward data-driven virtual tissue and organ modeling, providing a scalable route to whole-organ molecular reconstruction.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.