Development and formative application of the Health Data Readiness Level framework for federated health-data services.
Seymour, D.; Halliday, R.; Smart, J.; Burns, F.
Show abstract
Objectives: To develop a multidimensional framework for assessing organisational and system readiness for federated health-data services, and to report its formative application across three heterogeneous UK ecosystems. Methods: The Health Data Readiness Level (HDRL) framework was developed from a structured landscape review of 56 maturity and readiness frameworks, first-principles requirements analysis, artificial-intelligence-assisted synthesis with human source verification, and stakeholder refinement. It comprises 64 indicators in eight domains and five ordered levels. Formative application examined three heterogeneous UK health-data research ecosystems using documentary evidence, professional stakeholder input, workshops, a structured right-of-reply process, cross-case calibration, and two illustrative research use cases. Analysis was descriptive; the application was not designed as psychometric validation or a league table. Results: All 64 indicators were scoreable in each case. Publicly reported profiles ranged from Developing (Level 2 -3) to Managed (Level 3 -4); all three cases met the proposed minimum for five foundational indicators. Recurring constraints concerned evidence of measured service performance, national-scale primary-care data access, cross-jurisdiction governance reciprocity, workforce capacity, and sustainable funding. Pandemic-era four-nation research was delivered through coordinated local analyses and meta-analysis, rather than routine automated federation. Discussion: HDRL operationalises a broad service- and system-readiness view that complements technical and governance specifications. Content validity, inter-rater reliability, aggregation choices, responsiveness and predictive validity remain to be established. Conclusion: HDRL is an evidence-informed candidate improvement and planning instrument for federated health-data services. It should not yet be used as an accreditation standard or as an official participation threshold for the UK's Health Data Research Service.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation Science Protocol for a participatory, theory-informed implementation research programme in the context of health system strengthening in sub-Saharan Africa (ASSET-ImplementER) 94%
- Ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes among healthcare workers in the United Kingdom: UK-REACH ethico-legal research, qualitative research on healthcare workers’ experiences, and stakeholder engagement protocol 93%
- How and why do Quality Circles work for General Practitioners - a realist approach 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 94%
- Development and preliminary testing of Health Equity Across the AI Lifecycle (HEAAL): A framework for healthcare delivery organizations to mitigate the risk of AI solutions worsening health inequities 94%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency: appraisal of the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre processes and impact, 2021-23 95%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 94%
- The challenges of replication: a worked example of methods reproducibility using routinely collected healthcare data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 94%
- Cracking the Code: A Scoping Review to Unite Disciplines in Tackling Legal Issues in Health Artificial Intelligence 93%
- Development of a customised data management system for a COVID-19-adapted colorectal cancer pathway 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of ‘Learning from Deaths’ reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020 94%
- Improving the impact of pharmacy interventions in hospitals 92%
- Improving local authority financial support services for users with complex health needs: a mixed-method economic evaluation of Social Navigators in South Tyneside, UK 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.