Back

A surface-intrinsic framework for topology-preserving hippocampal alignment and precision morphometry

DeKraker, J.; Bansal, D.; Snyder, M.; Karat, B. G.; Talaei Kamalabadi, N.; Salman, M. Y.; Ngo, A.; Chen, J.; Sahlas, E.; Royer, J.; Cabalo, D. G.; Glasser, M. F.; Coalson, T. S.; Harwell, J.; Torkamani-Azar, M.; Liu, Y.; Tohka, J.; Lau, J. C.; Evans, A. C.; Bernhardt, B. C.; Khan, A. R.

2026-07-27 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.22.740127 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate alignment of hippocampal anatomy across individuals remains challenging due to complex and highly variable folding patterns that are not well captured by conventional volumetric approaches. HippUnfold introduced a surface-based representation of the hippocampus, but key components--including coordinate estimation and inter-subject correspondence--were defined in the volumetric domain, making them susceptible to topological errors and interpolation artifacts. Here, we introduce a surface-intrinsic formulation of hippocampal unfolding in which geometry, intrinsic coordinates, and correspondence are defined directly on subject-specific surface manifolds. Intrinsic anterior-posterior and proximal-distal coordinates are computed by solving Laplace equations on the surface, and correspondence is established through surface-based resampling in unfolded space, replacing inverse volumetric warping. Relative to the original HippUnfold approach, this formulation improves test-retest consistency, subject identifiability, and mesh quality, while better preserving subject-specific gyral and sulcal morphology. Surface representations show reduced distortion between folded and unfolded spaces and eliminate misplaced or outlier vertices associated with volumetric warping. These improvements translate to enhanced sensitivity in a clinical application, improving lateralization of temporal lobe epilepsy. These results demonstrate that a surface-intrinsic formulation provides a principled and robust foundation for hippocampal unfolding, enabling topology-preserving alignment and more accurate characterization of inter-individual variability in health and disease.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.