Back

A continuum of CAM phenotypes in the carnivorous plant genus Pinguicula (Lentibulariaceae)

Mok, D. W. L.; VanBuren, R.; Gilbert, K. J.

2026-07-23 plant biology
10.64898/2026.07.22.740078 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PremisePinguicula are carnivorous plants occupying a wide range of habitats, from wetlands to barren rock cliffs, where CAM photosynthesis was recently discovered in several species. This ecological and physiological diversity makes the genus a promising system for exploring the environmental drivers and evolutionary transitions underlying variation in CAM. Here, we present a physiological survey of CAM with a particular focus on the Mexican Clade, which contains the recently identified CAM species. MethodsWe conducted a carbon isotope survey of live and herbarium specimens to identify candidate CAM species. We then measured diurnal gas-exchange patterns and changes in leaf titratable acidity to quantify CAM activity. ResultsPinguicula species exhibited a variety of photosynthetic phenotypes. Pinguicula vulgaris showed no detectable evidence of CAM, whereas P. cyclosecta and P. moranensis demonstrated a C3-CAM physiology with most net assimilation via C3. Pinguicula martinezii also showed the same C3-CAM physiology under well-watered conditions but had strong facultative induction of CAM with drought. Pinguicula agnata displayed net assimilation via CAM. Titratable acidity had a positive correlation with {delta}13C within the species we sampled. ConclusionsOur results support the existence of a CAM physiological continuum within Pinguicula. Notably, closely related species encompass physiologies that span the large variation of CAM. This diversity provides a rare opportunity for future studies to investigate the evolution of CAM in closely related species, including differences and similarities between differing states across the continuum.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.