Back

TMEM135 deficiency remodels hepatic lipid homeostasis and protein malonylation through a DHA-sensitive lipogenic program buffered by peroxisomal metabolism

Hagimori, R.; Landowski, M.; Song, S.; Gogoi, P.; Brush, R. S.; Bonvicino, S. M.; Barrett-Wilt, G.; Ikeda, S.; Yamada, K.-i.; Yen, C.-L. E.; Takimoto, T.; Agbaga, M.-P.; Ikeda, A.

2026-07-23 cell biology
10.64898/2026.07.22.740069 bioRxiv
Show abstract

TMEM135 has been implicated in lipid metabolism, but its role in regulating hepatic lipid homeostasis remains unclear. Here, we investigated how TMEM135 affects hepatic lipid metabolism using Tmem135 mutant mice with liver-specific Pex5 deletion. The Tmem135 mutation induced a lipogenic state characterized by depletion of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), activation of SREBP-dependent pathways, and increased monounsaturated fatty acids without causing hepatic steatosis. In contrast, loss of PEX5-dependent peroxisomal function in Tmem135 mutant mice resulted in marked hepatic lipid accumulation, indicating that peroxisomal metabolism buffers the elevated lipogenic state. Fish oil supplementation to Tmem135 mutant mice restored DHA levels and suppressed lipogenesis. Proteomics identified distinct DHA-sensitive metabolic programs, including activation of SREBP-dependent lipogenesis. Quantitative malonyl-proteomics revealed increased malonylation of glycolytic enzymes, accompanied by altered glycolytic output. Together, these findings identify TMEM135 as a central regulator of hepatic lipid metabolism and uncover a coordinated mechanism linking lipid availability, lipogenesis, and post-translational metabolic regulation. HighlightTmem135 mutation induces a lipogenic state with increased lipolysis without hepatic steatosis. PEX5-dependent peroxisomal function buffers lipid accumulation in Tmem135 mutant liver. Fish oil supplementation restores DHA and suppresses SREBP-dependent lipogenesis in Tmem135 mutants. DHA-sensitive protein malonylation targets glycolytic enzymes in Tmem135 mutant liver.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.