From whole-slide histology to ADC maps: Fast diffusion MRI simulation with neural operators
Kohler, I. A.; Goedicke, O.; Kuder, T. A.; Ladd, M. E.; Hesser, J.
Show abstract
Background and ObjectiveSimulation of diffusion MRI signals from tissue microstructure is a fundamental problem in quantitative imaging, as it enables controlled study of how cellular architecture influences measured signals. However, physics-based simulations at clinically relevant scales are challenging due to a scale mismatch between imaging and histology: clinical diffusion MRI spans centimeter-scale fields of view with millimeter-scale voxels, whereas histology resolves structure at micrometer scales. Capturing voxel-wise signal formation therefore requires repeated simulations over heterogeneous microstructure, which becomes computationally and memory intensive in classical solvers. We propose a neural operator framework that amortizes this cost by learning local microstruc-ture-signal mappings once and applying them across large tissue regions. MethodsWe train a Fourier Neural Operator on finite-element simulations of histology-derived cell segmentations to predict magnetization fields from diffusivity and permeability maps. The model is embedded in a subdomain tiling strategy that enables scalable inference over whole-slide histology images. Unlike most conventional simulation pipelines, inference operates directly on regular grids derived from cell segmentations and does not require meshing. ResultsThe proposed framework enables simulation of apparent diffusion coefficient maps over 2D liver histology spanning 28.224 mm x 18.144 mm. It achieves over 2,600-fold acceleration compared with CPU-based finite-element simulation, reducing runtime from an estimated 217 days to under 2 hours. The network yields mean relative signal errors of 0.34%-0.43% at high diffusion weighting and 0.03% at low diffusion weighting, with maximum errors below 5%. On manually segmented datasets with greater morphological variability, mean errors increased slightly to 1.37%-1.79%. ConclusionsNeural operators enable computationally practical, mesh-free diffusion MRI simulation by amortizing expensive physics-based computation into a reusable operator applied across local sub-domains. This makes large-scale histology-based diffusion MRI modeling feasible while preserving high accuracy.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Training Data Distribution Significantly Impacts the Estimation of Tissue Microstructure with Machine Learning 96%
- Accelerated multi-shell diffusion MRI with Gaussian process estimated reconstruction of multi-band imaging 96%
- QSM Reconstruction Challenge 2.0: a realistic in silico head phantom for MRI data simulation and evaluation of susceptibility mapping procedures 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Decoding the microstructural properties of white matter using realistic models 95%
- Neural Networks for parameter estimation in microstructural MRI: a study with a high-dimensional diffusion-relaxation model of white matter microstructure 95%
- Accuracy and precision in super-resolution MRI: Enabling spherical tensor diffusion encoding at ultra-high b-values and high resolution 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multidimensional analysis and detection of informative features in diffusion MRI measurements of human white matter 94%
- The statistical challenge of finding spontaneous changes in functional connectivity in high-dimensional fMRI data 93%
- Localized semi-nonnegative matrix factorization (LocaNMF) of widefield calcium imaging data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hierarchical Bayesian Modelling Improves Microstructural Parameter Mapping in Diffusion and Exchange MRI Data 94%
- Non-negative least squares computation for in vivo myelin mapping using simulated multi-echo spin-echo T2 decay data 93%
- A Comparison of Skeletal Muscle Diffusion Tensor Imaging Tractography Seeding Methods 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.