Automation Disrupts, Explanations Restore: The Neural Signatures of Agency Loss and Recovery in Human-AI Interaction
Houdoyer, E.; Le Bars, S.; Chambon, V.
Show abstract
Automation has been shown to weaken the sense of agency (SoA), the experience of controlling ones actions and their outcomes, by disrupting the predictive link between intention and effect. Explainable AI (XAI) has been proposed as a solution, yet the neurocognitive mechanisms through which explanations restore agency remain unclear. Across three EEG experiments using an autonomous-driving paradigm, we examined how automation and different forms of AI explanations modulate explicit agency judgments and early neural markers of agency-related predictive processing. In Experiment 1, automation reduced explicit feelings of control and was associated with reduced sensory attenuation, as reflected by increased P1-N1 amplitudes, decreased N1-P2 amplitudes, and delayed N1 latencies. In Experiment 2, distal (goal-level) explanations partially restored agency and selectively modulated early auditory responses, decreasing P1-N1 and increasing N1-P2 amplitudes. In Experiment 3, combining distal and proximal (trajectory-level) explanations produced the strongest behavioural and neural restoration of agency, yielding a graded attenuation of P1-N1 and enhanced N1-P2 responses along with accelerated N1 latencies. Across all experiments, mismatch negativity (MMN) remained unaffected, indicating that pre-attentive deviance detection is preserved regardless of agency or explainability. Together, these results identify component-specific EEG markers that track fluctuations in the sense of agency and demonstrate that multi-level intention sharing by AI systems enhances both predictive engagement and explicit control experience. This work provides a neurocognitive foundation for designing explainable autonomous systems capable of maintaining user agency.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Beat-based and memory-based temporal expectations in rhythm: similar perceptual effects, different underlying mechanisms 97%
- Neural repetition suppression modulates time perception: evidence from electrophysiology and pupillometry 96%
- Dynamic interplay between reward and voluntary attention determines stimulus processing in visual cortex 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-modal interactions between auditory attention and oculomotor control 96%
- Dissociable Pupil and Oculomotor Markers of Attention Allocation and Distractor Suppression during listening 96%
- Salience-dependent disruption of sustained auditory attention can be inferred from evoked pupil responses and neural tracking of task-irrelevant sounds 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.