Steroid sulfatase deficiency increases the frequency and persistence of ventricular arrhythmias in mice
Garland-Thomas, F.; Saverse, A.; Fowler, E. D.; Davies, W.
Show abstract
BackgroundEmerging evidence in humans has linked Xp22.31 genetic deletions to an increased risk of stress-induced arrhythmias, and association analysis across Xp22.31 has shown enrichment for atrial fibrillation genetic risk variants around STS (steroid sulfatase). MethodsWe compared heart rhythm in homozygous STS-knockout (STS-KO) adult mice (n=19) to wildtype (WT) mice (n=11) under baseline (Tyrodes solution), and {beta}-adrenergic stimulation (stress), conditions using ex vivo perfused-heart electrocardiography (ECG). Ventricular ectopic beats (VEBs) were manually-identified, and rhythm abnormalities were quantified using a semi-automated approach. ResultsAt baseline, the groups displayed comparable sinus cycle length and ECG intervals; all WT hearts showed stable sinus rhythm, whereas [~]30% of STS-KO hearts developed spontaneous VEBs. WT hearts typically maintained steady rhythm under {beta}-adrenergic stimulation; in contrast, [~]60% of STS-KO hearts displayed VEBs. Under baseline and stimulated conditions the QRS interval was greater during VEBs than normal beats in STS-KO hearts, consistent with a ventricular origin. We identified a higher frequency of any abnormal beats in STS-KO hearts than in WT hearts under baseline (1.9{+/-}0.7% vs. 0.3{+/-}0.1%, p=0.038) and stimulated (5.3{+/-}2.2% vs. 0.5{+/-}0.3%, p=0.047) conditions. Under stimulated conditions, abnormal beats only occurred singly in WT hearts, whereas in STS-KO hearts, [~]50% of the time they occurred in runs of two or more. ConclusionSTS deficiency in mice predisposes to arrhythmias, and the STS-KO mouse represents a tractable model for mechanistic investigation. These data support the contention that STS activity influences arrhythmic vulnerability in humans and that STS should be considered for inclusion in arrhythmia-related gene panels.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Competing Risks in Patients with Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverters Defibrillators: Global Electrical Heterogeneity and Clinical Outcomes (GEHCO) Study 95%
- SUMOylation of the Cardiac Sodium Channel NaV1.5 Modifies Inward Current and Cardiac Excitability 93%
- High Initial Heart Rate Score is an Independent Predictor of New Atrial High-Rate Episodes in Pacemaker Patients with Sinus Node Dysfunction 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Selectivity filter mutation in NaV1.5 promotes ventricular tachycardia 96%
- Adrenergic Hypersensitivity Drives Ventricular Arrhythmias Following Loss of Plexin-Mediated Cardiac Innervation 96%
- Vascular Endothelial Barrier Protection Prevents Atrial Fibrillation by Preserving Cardiac Nanostructure 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Arrhythmia variant associations and reclassifications in the eMERGE-III sequencing study 97%
- Leveraging a genetic proxy to investigate the effects of lifelong cardiac sodium channel blockade 95%
- Arrhythmia and Survival Outcomes among Black and White Patients with a Primary Prevention Defibrillator 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Conserved Role of the Large Conductance Calcium-Activated Potassium Channel, KCa1.1, in Sinus Node Function and Arrhythmia Risk 96%
- Sex-Specific Clinical and Genetic Factors Associated with Adverse Outcomes in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 95%
- Rare Genetic Variants Associated with Sudden Cardiac Arrest in the Young: A Prospective, Population-Based Study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism Reduces Atrial Arrhythmias Post-Cardiac Surgery and Attenuates Atrial Stress Responses to Cardioplegic Arrest 95%
- Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy -- The Impact of Age at Diagnosis of the Proband on Genetic Yield, Clinical Presentation, Outcomes, and Yield of Family Screening 94%
- The effect of sex and underlying disease on the genetic association of QT interval and sudden cardiac death 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.