Back

H5N1 influenza binding and cell entry via human class II MHC, and blocking by cross-reactive antibodies

Pursell, T.; Mikelov, A.; Wirz, O. F.; Ort, J. T.; Li, S. H.; Atkinson, R. K.; Zhong, J.; Santos, J. J. S.; Joshi, S. A.; Afghani, J.; Han, X.; Haraguchi, E.; Hoh, R. A.; Lee, J.-Y.; Lam, B.; Stanford, A.; DeLaitsch, A. T.; Schuetz, J.; Röltgen, K.; Van Slyck, S.; Smith, D.; Ha, B.; Niemann, C. U.; Hensley, S. E.; Boyd, S. D.

2026-07-26 immunology
10.64898/2026.07.22.739677 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Summary paragraphHighly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b viruses are currently responsible for a multi-species outbreak affecting wild birds, poultry, numerous mammalian species, and humans. Influenza A viruses typically initiate infection through binding to sialic acid, although select bat and human influenza viruses can also exploit class II major histocompatibility complex (MHC-II) molecules for cell entry. Here we show that emerging H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b viruses, but not historical H5 lineages, bind human MHC-II HLA-DR and mediate sialic acid-independent cell entry. Hemagglutinin binding to primary human immune cells varies with MHC-II expression and is further shaped by HLA-DR allelic variation, identifying host genetic determinants that may influence susceptibility to infection. Mammalian-adaptive substitutions within the hemagglutinin sialic acid receptor-binding domain reduce MHC-II binding, suggesting this interaction is remodeled during clade 2.3.4.4b H5 adaptation to a human host. Lastly, cross-reactive monoclonal antibodies isolated from clade 2.3.4.4b H5-naive humans can block the hemagglutinin-MHC-II interaction. These findings identify a previously unrecognized receptor pathway in contemporary H5N1 viruses and reveal that both human genetic variation and pre-existing humoral immunity can modulate this interaction, with implications for host range, cellular tropism, spillover risk, and therapeutic intervention.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.