Forecasting Trajectories of Physiological Mechanics with Sparse Clinical Data Using a Data Assimilation and Machine Learning Hybrid
Wang, Y.; Stroh, J. N.; Ghosh, D.; Sirlanci, M.; Hripcsak, G.; Bennett, T. D.; Albers, D.
Show abstract
Clinical decisions for determining optimal patient-specific interventions are complicated prediction tasks that rely on health care professionals' understanding of physiological mechanisms and their dynamics. These decisions are challenged by (a) observational data sparsity and (b) patient heterogeneity. Here, we focus on estimating and forecasting specific physiological properties--that are not explicitly present in clinical observations--to provide additional features using only data available bedside at the time of decision-making. Mechanistic models of physiological system(s), e.g., physiological ordinary differential equation (ODE) models, provide pathways to compensate for data sparsity by synchronizing the model with observations of an individual patient using data assimilation (DA). However, DA used in a standard computational workflow to estimate constant model parameters from presently-known data is less effective at optimizing state forecasts of the model governed by physiological processes that evolve before new observations are available. Stated simply, we cannot forecast the future evolution of the model because we cannot forecast model parameters. To support next-generation clinical decision support, we develop a new DA and machine learning (ML) hybrid pipeline to estimate and forecast individual future physiological processes by forecasting ODE model parameters. This pipeline overcomes model and DA workflow limitations by stacking a DA-estimated posterior empirical distribution of physiological parameters with longitudinal ML forecasting models. We work within the context of glycemic management in an ICU using EHR data to construct and test a use case. We use synthetic data and real-world clinical data to validate the integrated pipeline and quantify uncertainties.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A methodology of phenotyping ICU patients from EHR data: high-fidelity, personalized, and interpretable phenotypes estimation 98%
- Hypothesis-driven modeling of the human lung-ventilator system for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome research 94%
- Individual Reference Intervals for Personalized Interpretation of Clinical and Metabolomics Measurements 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Bayesian Susceptible-Infectious-Hospitalized-Ventilated-Recovered Model to Predict Demand for COVID-19 Inpatient Care in a Large Healthcare System 94%
- Prediction of Covid-19 spreading and optimal coordination of counter-measures: From microscopic to macroscopic models to Pareto fronts 94%
- Compressive Big Data Analytics: An Ensemble Meta-Algorithm for High-dimensional Multisource Datasets 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.