AI-Enabled Echocardiography Identifies an Adverse Epicardial Adiposity Phenotype Associated with Cardiometabolic Dysfunction
Aminorroaya, A.; Coppi, A.; McNamara, R. L.; Lima, J. A. C.; Krumholz, H. M.; Antoniades, C.; Khera, R.; Oikonomou, E. K.
Show abstract
Background: Excess epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is associated with cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) dysfunction, but its assessment has traditionally required advanced imaging. We tested whether AI-enhanced echocardiography could enable scalable phenotyping of adverse epicardial adiposity and identify individuals at increased cardiometabolic risk. Methods: We developed PanAdipo, a video-based deep learning model in 1,114,441 videos from 28,797 studies across the Yale-New Haven Health System (YNHHS; 2016-2022), using expert reader annotations of prominent EAT (2.5% of studies). PanAdipo was evaluated in four cohorts: a temporally distinct YNHHS TTE set (n=4,588), an emergency department point-of-care ultrasound cohort across YNHHS (n=10,957), the geographically distinct MIMIC-IV cohort (n=4,549), and the community-based Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA Exam 6, n=2,740). Analyses examined (i) discrimination of prominent EAT; (ii) independence from conventional echocardiographic outputs; (iii) spatial explainability using gradient-weighted class activation mapping; (iv) correspondence with paired cardiac CT-derived body composition phenotypes (n=5,594); and (v) age-, sex-, and BMI-independent associations with cardiometabolic biomarkers and incident metabolic disease. Results: In the held-out health system test set, PanAdipo discriminated prominent EAT with an AUROC of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88-0.94), exceeding conventional measures of cardiac function and structure. In explainability analyses, the model's attention localized to the epicardial area across views and throughout the cardiac cycle. On paired cardiac CT imaging, the PanAdipo score correlated most strongly with epicardial adiposity (Spearman's rho=0.75; P<0.001) with weaker correlations with other adipose and non-adipose compartments and only modest correlations with BMI across cohorts (rho=0.19-0.40). In MESA, greater PanAdipo scores were independently associated with higher HOMA-IR and triglycerides, associations that persisted among normoglycemic participants. Higher PanAdipo scores were also associated with newly documented metabolic disease, including MASLD/MASH, after adjustment for BMI (HRpooled 1.25 [1.08-1.44] per 1-SD increment in log[PanAdipo]). Conclusions: AI-enabled echocardiography provides a scalable, view-agnostic biomarker that characterizes adverse epicardial adiposity and is associated with cardiometabolic dysfunction, highlighting a novel role for echocardiography in CKM risk stratification.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical and genetic associations of asymmetric apical and septal left ventricular hypertrophy 96%
- Development and Multinational Validation of an Ensemble Deep Learning Algorithm for Detecting and Predicting Structural Heart Disease Using Noisy Single-lead Electrocardiograms 94%
- Natural Language Processing to Identify Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Aortic Stenosis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of polygenic score for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the general population and across clinical settings 96%
- Genetic Analysis of Right Heart Structure and Function in 40,000 People 95%
- Large scale genome-wide association analyses identify novel genetic loci and mechanisms in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-wide association analysis and Mendelian randomization proteomics identify novel protein biomarkers and drug targets for primary prevention of heart failure 94%
- Deep Learning of Left Atrial Structure and Function Provides Link to Atrial Fibrillation Risk 94%
- Association of machine learning-derived measures of body fat distribution with cardiometabolic diseases in >40,000 individuals 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.