Projected economic gains and lives saved under universal healthcare in the United States
Pandey, A.; Wells, C. R.; Ye, Y.; Fitzpatrick, M. C.; Galvani, A. P.
Show abstract
The US spends more on health care than any other nation, yet tens of millions of Americans are uninsured or underinsured, and coverage retractions enacted in 2025 are widening these gaps. The misalignment between the for-profit insurance architecture and optimal patient care, together with the inefficiencies of a fragmented system, contributes to both unnecessary costs and preventable mortality. We update our previous analyses with the most recent data to project the economic benefits and the number of lives saved that would be achieved by single-payer universal coverage, as proposed in the Medicare for All Act. We estimate that such a system would reduce national health expenditure by $1,041 billion annually. Sources of savings include reductions in administrative overhead, pharmaceutical prices, fraudulent billing, and avoidable emergency care. Combined with the reversal of recent retractions, universal coverage would save over 114,000 lives annually.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Doctors and Nurses Social Media Ads Reduced Holiday Travel and COVID-19 infections: A cluster randomized controlled trial in 13 States 91%
- Assessment of Individual- and Community-level Risks for COVID-19 Mortality in the US and Implications for Vaccine Distribution 90%
- Health and economic impacts of Lassa vaccination campaigns in West Africa 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reductions in 2020 US life expectancy due to COVID-19 and the disproportionate impact on the Black and Latino populations 90%
- Estimating the lives that could be saved by expanded access to weight-loss drugs 90%
- P-hacking in clinical trials and how incentives shapethe distribution of results across phases 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.