From Recognition to Reimbursement: An Assessment of State Medicaid Coverage Policies for Genetic Counselors and a Path Forward
Connors, P. D.; Guan, Y.; James, C. A.; Polaris, J.; Cantfil, B.; Campbell, C. A.
Show abstract
Purpose As genomics permeates all healthcare specialties, genetic counseling in conjunction with genetic testing is broadly recommended. Improving access to genetics professionals is crucial for Americans insured by Medicaid. The purpose of this study was to conduct a comprehensive review of Medicaid policies for genetic counseling performed by Certified Genetic Counselors (CGC(C)). Methods Fee-for-service Medicaid policies across 50 states and Washington DC were reviewed and coded. Four states with exemplary policies were identified, and CGC managers in two of these were surveyed regarding the real-world effects of these policies. Results As of 2024, 20 states (39%) had a published policy for genetic counseling with most (N=16, 80%) expressly covering genetic counseling in connection with any covered genetic test. Of the states without a policy, 12 (24%) mention genetic counseling in the context of scenario-specific policies, and 19 (37%) have no published policy. Twenty states explicitly cover CGC services, while 2 exclude CGCs as service providers. CGC managers in Indiana and Michigan confirmed the policies identified as exemplary successfully led to reimbursement of CGC services. Conclusion There is significant variability in Medicaid coverage for genetic counseling. Comprehensive policies are needed to support patient access to genetics professionals, including CGCs.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Using Coincidence Analysis to Identify Causal Chains of Factors Associated with Implementation and Optimization of Lynch Syndrome Tumor Screening Across Multiple Health care Systems 94%
- Development and evaluation of a novel educational program for providers on the use of polygenic risk scores 92%
- The landscape of reported VUS in multi-gene panel and genomic testing: Time for a change 89%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Pooled Electronic Consultation Program to Improve Access to Genetics Specialists 93%
- Evaluation of DNA-poli: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial to assess a digital platform for family cascade genetic testing and predictive genetic counselling 86%
- Early Diagnosis of Vascular Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome Through AI-Powered Facial Analysis: Results from the Montalcino Aortic Consortium 85%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetically Guided Precision Medicine Clinical Decision Support Tools: A Systematic Review 91%
- Measuring Quality-of-Care in Treatment of Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Novel Application of Natural Language Processing 90%
- Clinical Implementation Of Preemptive Pharmacogenomics Testing For Personalized Medicine At An Academic Medical Center 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Defining the Critical Educational Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: Views of US-Based Genetic Counselors and Medical Geneticists 95%
- Benefits and barriers to implementing precision preventive care: results of a national physician survey 93%
- A Qualitative Study Exploring the Consumer Experience of Receiving Self-Initiated Polygenic Risk Scores from a Third-Party Website 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.