Single cell RNA sequencing of D. pseudoobscura testes reveals transcriptional signatures of heteromorphic spermatogenesis
Messer, F.; Talbot, A. T.; Williams, S.; Harmston, N.; White-Cooper, H.
Show abstract
Sperm heteromorphy, the production of multiple sperm morphs with distinct functions, has evolved repeatedly in animals but its developmental and molecular basis remains poorly understood. In the Drosophila obscura group, males produce fertilising eusperm and non-fertilising parasperm, yet when and how these lineages diverge is unclear. Here, we applied single-cell RNA sequencing to whole testes of D. pseudoobscura to resolve cell-type composition, developmental trajectories, and transcriptional differences between sperm morphs. Analysis of [~]6,500 cells across two replicates identified germline and somatic cell populations and reconstructed spermatogenesis from stem cells to elongated spermatids. We identified a bifurcation in the germline trajectory at the early spermatocyte stage, corresponding to eusperm and parasperm lineages, which was maintained through spermiogenesis. Euspermatocytes, destined to generate longer eusperm, exhibited higher transcriptional activity than paraspermatocytes. Differentially expressed genes included structural sperm tail components, chromatin condensation proteins, post-meiotically transcribed genes and gene duplications resulting in paralogues with reciprocal expression patterns. We also identified markers of somatic cyst cells, including head and tail cyst cells, but found no evidence of morph-specific specialisation within the cyst cell lineage. The transcriptional activities of the distinct germline trajectories corresponded with differential expression of orthologues of critical transcriptional regulators known in D. melanogaster. The transcriptional activator TGIF was enriched in euspermatocytes, while the transcriptional repressor kmg was upregulated in paraspermatocytes. GFP-tagged Kmg showed higher abundance and greater chromatin localisation in paraspermatocytes. These findings demonstrate that sperm morph identity is first apparent in early primary spermatocytes and is largely germline intrinsic. We propose that differential transcriptional provisioning and developmental timing underpin sperm length, providing a framework for understanding the evolution and regulation of sperm heteromorphy.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The C-terminal ZZ domain of the Drosophila ORB2 RNA-binding protein is required for spermatid individualization 97%
- A deficiency screen identifies genomic regions critical for sperm head-tail connection 96%
- The condensin II/TOP-2 axis silences transcription during germline specification in C. elegans 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- TAF4b transcription networks regulating early oocyte differentiation 96%
- VCP acts downstream of tTAFs to downregulate mono-ubiquitinated H2A and promote spermatocyte differentiation in Drosophila 95%
- The intrinsically disordered protein SPE-18 promotes localized assembly of the major sperm protein in C. elegans spermatocytes 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Two classes of amine/glutamate multi-transmitter neurons innervate Drosophila internal male reproductive organs 96%
- OVO Positively Regulates Essential Maternal Pathways by Binding Near the Transcriptional Start Sites in the Drosophila Female Germline 95%
- Differential modifications of the C-terminal tails of α-tubulin isoforms and their importance for kinesin-based microtubule transport in vivo 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-nucleus transcriptomes reveal functional and evolutionary properties of cell types in the Drosophila accessory gland 97%
- Different complex regulatory phenotypes underlie hybrid male sterility in divergent rodent crosses 96%
- The zinc-finger transcription factor LSL-1 is a major regulator of the germline transcriptional program in C. elegans 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.