Back

Ultrastructural remodelling of tau fibrils during ghost tangle formation in Alzheimer's disease brain

Stähli, D. A.; Travers, L.; Shafiei, N.; van den Heuvel, L.; Vialaneix, E.; Schneider, P. L.; Rozemuller, A. J.; van de Berg, W. D. J.; Stahlberg, H.; Lewis, A. J.

2026-07-24 pathology
10.64898/2026.07.21.739778 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Tau aggregation into intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) is one of the major hallmarks of Alzheimers disease (AD). Based on neuropathological studies, NFTs have been classified into pre-tangles, mature tangles, and ghost tangles, however the ultrastructural transitions between these stages remain poorly understood. Here, we used correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM) to structurally characterize tau tangle maturity states in post-mortem human AD brain tissue. Pre-tangles showed no consistent fibrillar ultrastructure. Mature tangles contained densely packed, highly aligned paired helical filaments (PHF) and straight filaments (SF), often organized in spatially distinct bundles within the neuronal soma. Ghost tangles lacked cellular organelles and were composed predominantly of thin fibrils compartmentalized by membranous structures, with fibril morphology differing between compartmentalized and non-compartmentalized regions. Electron tomography and fibril segmentation demonstrated that these fibrils were significantly thinner than PHFs and SFs while immunogold labeling using the 2E9 tau marker confirmed the presence of tau within both mature and ghost tangle fibrils. GFAP-positive astrocytic processes infiltrated fibril-rich compartments within ghost tangles, linking astrocytic engagement with the emergence of this distinct ultrastructural organization. Together, our findings show that ghost-tangles contain a structurally distinct population of tau fibrils, suggesting that tau aggregates undergo astrocytic-mediated structural remodeling at late stages of pathology.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.