AINN-Express: A Leakage-Aware, Sequence-Only Predictor of VHH Antibody Expression Built on the AINN-P1 Protein Foundation Model
Wang, R.; Jin, K.; Pan, L.
Show abstract
Expression -- whether an antibody can be produced at usable yield -- is one of the earliest and most expensive filters in therapeutic discovery. We present AINN-Express, a sequence-only predictor of VHH single-domain antibody (nanobody) expression built on AINN-P1, Ainnocences protein foundation model. AINN-Express encodes a VHH with a frozen AINN-P1 encoder and scores it with a lightweight gradient-boosted classifier: it takes only an amino-acid sequence, returns an expression probability, and needs no structure and no per-task model training. Under a leakage-safe, leave-program-out evaluation, AINN-Express reaches ROC-AUC 0.87 within known antibody programs and 0.81 on entirely new programs -- well above the majority baseline -- making it a practical tool for prioritizing candidates before wet-lab work. We further justify the encoder choice with a controlled, leakage-aware benchmark against general-purpose protein language models: on this task, AINN-P1 (167 M parameters) generalizes to unseen programs far better than a general-purpose ESM2 (650 M) -- 0.81 versus 0.68 new-program ROC-AUC -- and matches a domain-finetuned ESM2 (0.83) with no task-specific finetuning, at roughly one-quarter of the parameters. The gap is invisible under a random split, where all encoders score [~]0.88; only leave-program-out evaluation reveals that general-purpose embeddings largely encode program identity rather than transferable determinants of expression. Purpose-built representation quality, not parameter count, is what makes AINN-Express generalize.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.