Changes in disability status and oral healthcare affordability among working-age Australians
Cooray, U.; Kaur, G.; Khalatbari-Soltani, S.; Janssens, B.; Disney, G.; Cole, R.; Singh, A.
Show abstract
Importance: Oral healthcare is often financed outside universal medical coverage, leaving working-age adults exposed to out-of-pocket costs. People with long-term disability may face added financial, physical, and service barriers to care, but longitudinal evidence on disability and oral healthcare unaffordability is limited. Objective: To estimate the effect of time-varying long-term disability on oral healthcare unaffordability among working-age adults in Australia. Design: Longitudinal cohort study using Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey data from waves 18 to 22 (2018-2022), analysed with targeted maximum likelihood estimation for longitudinal modified treatment policies. Setting: Nationally representative household panel survey in Australia. Participants: Adults aged 25 to 65 years at wave 18 who could validly contribute to the longitudinal analysis (identified using HILDA longitudinal weights) and had complete baseline covariate data. Exposure: Time-varying self-reported disability at waves 18 to 21 (2018-2022), defined as any long-term health condition, impairment, or disability restricting everyday activities and lasting, or likely to last, for at least 6 months. Hypothetical interventions comprised 50% and 25% reductions in the odds of disability at each wave, and deterministic sustained disability and no disability regimes. Main Outcome and Measure: Self-reported avoidance of dental treatment because of cost at wave 22 (2022). Results: The analytic sample included 9635 adults; 4901 (50.9%) were female, mean age was 44 (SD=12) years, and 2419 (25.1%) reported disability at baseline. A total of 399 participants (4.1%) reported oral healthcare unaffordable at wave 22 follow-up. Compared with the natural course, sustained disability increased the risk of unaffordability (risk ratio [RR], 1.60; 95% CI, 1.15-2.22). No disability at any time point reduced the risk (RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.45-0.77). Reducing the odds of disability by 50% and 25% also reduced the risk of oral healthcare unaffordability by 28% (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.65-0.81) and 17% (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.78-0.89), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Under the study assumptions, long-term disability was estimated to increase experienced unaffordability of oral healthcare among working-age Australians. Population level policy responses should address both the upstream conditions that shape disability trajectories and the downstream exclusion of adult dental care from routine financial protection.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The health impact of long COVID during the 2021-2022 Omicron wave in Australia: a quantitative burden of disease study 92%
- Association between household composition and severe COVID-19 outcomes in older people by ethnicity: an observational cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform 90%
- The Causal Effects of Health Conditions and Risk Factors on Social and Socioeconomic Outcomes: Mendelian Randomization in UK Biobank 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inequalities in healthcare disruptions during the Covid-19 pandemic: Evidence from 12 UK population-based longitudinal studies 92%
- Public acceptability of non-pharmaceutical interventions to control a pandemic in the United Kingdom: a discrete choice experiment 92%
- Impact of a sanitation intervention on quality of life and mental wellbeing in low-income urban neighbourhoods of Maputo, Mozambique 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The health impacts of a 4-month long community-wide COVID-19 lockdown: Findings from a prospective longitudinal study in the state of Victoria, Australia 91%
- Health and Economic Costs of Early, Delayed and No Suppression of COVID-19: The Case of Australia 91%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A review of the effectiveness and experiences of welfare advice services co-located in health settings: a critical narrative systematic review 89%
- Association of COVID-19 employment disruption with mental and social wellbeing: evidence from nine UK longitudinal studies 88%
- Participatory Approaches in Community Health in light of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review Protocol 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Community prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in England during April to September 2020: Results from the ONS Coronavirus Infection Survey 89%
- Detecting COVID-19 infection hotspots in England using large-scale self-reported data from a mobile application: a prospective, observational study 89%
- Changes in COVID-19-related mortality across key demographic and clinical subgroups: an observational cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform on 18 million adults in England 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.