Back

Histological assessment of integrated human cortical organoid grafts after controlled cortical impact

Smith, C.; Hamimi, S.; Castellanos, M.; Noel, E. S.; Serrano, A. P.; Inaltekin, S.; Shah, N.; Perez, W. A.; Rauscher, F. J.; Kim, J.; Song, H.; Johnson, V. E.; Chen, H.-C. I.; Jgamadze, D.

2026-07-24 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.20.739683 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Rodent models are a mainstay of traumatic brain injury (TBI) research, including investigations into the pathophysiology and treatment of this condition. However, there are fundamental molecular and cellular differences between rodent and human neurons, as well as other cells of the brain. Brain organoids derived from human pluripotent stem cells recapitulate key features of the human brain and have been used to model a variety of neurological disorders. Here, we developed a novel in vivo model of human TBI based on controlled cortical impact (CCI) injuries of human organoid grafts transplanted into the brains of young adult rats. Cortical organoids derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) were grown for 50-60 days in vitro before transplantation into rat visual cortex. Injures were performed 2 months later, and histological outcomes were examined at 7 or 30 days after injury. Injury cavities in the integrated grafts were identified at both endpoints with a progression toward larger cavities sizes with time. The injured human tissue exhibited evidence of neuroinflammation with elevated numbers of IBA1+ cells and axonal injury with APP+ cells. There was evidence of increased cell proliferation in the injured grafts acutely after injury that decreased with time. The injured grafts also showed evidence of phosphorylated tau aggregates and accumulation of PNAG, a polysaccharide associated with microbial pathogens. These results support the feasibility of using human organoid grafts in rats as a model of TBI, potentially including the study of long-term neurodegeneration and microbial penetration of the brain after injury.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.