Endometrial transcriptomic and ciliation analysis after scratch shows no signature linked to live birth following IVF
Proudley, E. E.; Pearson-Farr, J. E.; Reddin, I. G.; Pye, C.; Laird, S. M.; Lewis, R. M.; Cleal, J. K.; Metwally, M.; Cheong, Y. C.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo determine whether endometrial scratch induces differences in transcriptomic profiles or epithelial cell ciliation in the endometrium at the window of implantation that associate with live birth following IVF. DesignSecondary analysis of 50 matched endometrial biopsies collected within a randomised controlled trial evaluating the clinical effectiveness of endometrial scratch before first-time IVF. SettingEndometrial biopsy samples were obtained from women attending the Jessop Wing of Sheffield Teaching Hospitals. Population or SampleWomen undergoing first-time IVF who received an endometrial scratch in the preceding cycle at the window of implantation (6-10 days after LH surge). MethodsEndometrial biopsies were molecularly dated using transcriptomic menstrual-cycle staging algorithms. Bulk RNA sequencing was analysed using DESeq2 with FDR correction, and principal component analysis (PCA) assessed clustering patterns. Epithelial cell ciliation was quantified using immunohistochemistry and an automated Python-based image analysis pipeline. Main Outcome MeasuresDifferential endometrial gene expression between women with and without live birth after IVF; percentage coverage of ciliated epithelial cells in luminal and glandular regions. ResultsTranscriptomic dating confirmed no differences in menstrual-cycle timing between live-birth and no-live-birth groups. No significant differential gene expression was detected (log2FC >2, FDR <0.05), and PCA showed no clustering by pregnancy outcome. Ciliation coverage did not differ between outcome groups or between glandular and luminal surfaces. ConclusionsWhen implantation timing is precisely defined, endometrial scratch does not produce detectable transcriptomic changes or alterations in epithelial ciliation that distinguish women who achieve live birth after IVF. FundingWellbeing of Women RG2147; Wessex Medical Research; Rosetrees Trust (PGS23/100171).
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcriptional profiling of mucus production and modification in rhesus macaque endocervical cells under hormonal regulation 94%
- The SARS-CoV-2 receptor, Angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is required for human endometrial stromal cell decidualization 94%
- Irx3 Promotes Gap Junction Communication Between Uterine Stromal Cells to Regulate Vascularization during Embryo Implantation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Uterine secretome initiates growth of gynecologic tissues in ectopic locations. 95%
- Cohort profile: The Bristol IVF Study- A longitudinal study of women, their partners and treatment outcomes following assisted reproductive technologies 94%
- Measurement of changes to the menstrual cycle: A transdisciplinary systematic review evaluating measure quality and utility for clinical trials 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single cell RNA sequencing and lineage tracing confirm mesenchyme to epithelial transformation (MET) contributes to repair of the endometrium at menstruation 96%
- Multi-omics analyses and machine learning prediction of oviductal responses in the presence of gametes and embryos 94%
- N-cadherin mechanosensing in ovarian follicles controls oocyte maturation and ovulation 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.