A large-scale crowd-sourced annotated acoustic dataset of Indian fauna
Ramesh, V.; Singh, S.; Pop, P.; Choksi, P.; Singh, P.; Khanwilkar, S.; Teotia, S.; Burli, P.; Devarajan, K.; A, A.; A Nakhwa, A.; Abdus Shakur, M.; Baishya, R.; Bhagwat, N.; Biniwale, S.; Bora, C.; C S, S.; Chakraborty, N.; D'Souza, S.; D'Souza, E.; Vaishnav, R. D.; Deshpande, K.; Dhanda, A.; G, A.; Ghosh, A.; Goswami, R.; K N, A.; K P, N.; K Rajaraman, B.; K V, G.; Kannan, V.; Karthick, V.; Kotian, M.; Kumar, H.; Kurian, P.; Madhavan, M.; Meena, K.; Mohammad Maslehuddin, A.; Mourya, P.; Mudke, M.; R J, P.; R S Jha, R.; Ramesh, K.; Sailas, S. S.; Sangwan, T.; Mahesh, S.; Satish, R.; Shankar, A
Show abstract
Global rates of biodiversity loss warrant conservation action and monitoring at large geographic scales. Conservation technologies such as acoustic monitoring in conjunction with deep learning now enable us to monitor wildlife simultaneously across space and time. However, for a significant proportion of biodiversity in tropical regions, we cannot yet rely on automated recognition approaches because we lack acoustic templates to robustly train deep learning algorithms. In this paper, we relied on a novel participatory approach, enlisting researchers, conservation practitioners, and nature enthusiasts to create a unique crowd-sourced, open-access dataset of acoustic annotations across taxonomic groups for biodiversity in India. Our dataset comprises 3311 minutes of strongly labelled data (bounding boxes or annotations for a species vocalization) and 2504 minutes of weakly labelled data (indicating the presence of a species within an audio file but lacking bounding boxes) for 518 species across India, spanning 25 of 36 states and union territories. We present metadata and code for data processing and highlight the strengths of a participatory approach to biodiversity monitoring.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Chipper: Open-source software for semi-automated segmentation and analysis of birdsong and other natural sounds 94%
- SAFE Acoustics: an open-source, real-time eco-acoustic monitoring network in the tropical rainforests of Borneo 94%
- Nighthawk: acoustic monitoring of nocturnal bird migration in the Americas 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assemblage of Focal Species Recognizers - AFSR: A technique for decreasing false positive rates of acoustic automatic identification in a multiple species context 94%
- BirdNET can be as good as experts for acoustic bird monitoring in a European city 93%
- DISCO: A deep learning ensemble for uncertainty-aware segmentation of acoustic signals 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Visualization and quantification of coral reef soundscapes using CoralSoundExplorer software 94%
- Capturing the songs of mice with an improved detection and classification method for ultrasonic vocalizations (BootSnap) 93%
- Improving the workflow to crack Small, Unbalanced, Noisy, but Genuine (SUNG) datasets in bioacoustics: the case of bonobo calls 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.