Back

Thermal variability interacts with infection load and the evolution of host-parasite defense

Kramp, R. D.; Cocciardi, J. M.; Walsman, J. C.; Ohmer, M.

2026-07-21 ecology
10.64898/2026.07.20.739373 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Rising temperatures and unpredictable weather patterns are directly linked to emerging infectious diseases that threaten global biodiversity. Thermal variability affects host-parasite interactions, and understanding how animal hosts respond to temperature variability and parasite infection is paramount for conservation and for predicting zoonotic spillover. Hosts employ two strategies to defend against parasites: resistance (inhibiting or limiting infection) and tolerance (limiting the negative effects of infection). This observation raises a fundamental question: How does thermal variability affect the expression and evolution of resistance versus tolerance? Subsequently, how does the evolution of resistance versus tolerance influence parasite load dynamics? Here, we first review why temperature may differentially affect resistance and tolerance mechanisms, thereby altering host selection and eco-evolutionary disease outcomes. Second, to highlight the importance of these interactions, we present a model that illustrates key potential effects of temperature variability on host defense mechanisms. Our model demonstrates that temperature variability alone could drive lower infection prevalence and loads, but it also selects for host tolerance, ultimately leading to higher net prevalence and loads. We also find widely divergent outcomes depending on how temperature impacts defense strategies. These results highlight key areas for future empirical and theoretical work on the interactions among temperature variability, infection load, and host defense evolution.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.