Back

The Role of Secondary Chordae Tendineae in Mitral Valve Mechanics: A Benchtop Study

Karl, R.; Recco, D. P.; Kizilski, S.; Tharwat Abdelmoneim, I.; Kneier, N.; Hon, K.; Bergt, C. S.; del Nido, P. J.; Hoganson, D.; Engelhardt, S.; Hammer, P.

2026-07-22 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.07.20.736912 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeSecondary chordae tendineae (CT) are frequently disregarded during mitral valve (MV) repair. However, their contribution to MV biomechanics remains poorly understood. We hypothesized that secondary CT play an important role in maintaining leaflet geometry during valve closure. MethodsEleven explanted porcine MVs were micro-CT scanned in a systolic configuration under three conditions: (1) physiological baseline with all secondary CT intact, (2) transection of the A2 strut CT, and (3) transection of all secondary CT. Billowing height (BH), coaptation height (CH) along the parasternal long-axis view, and coaptation area (CA) were quantified and compared between conditions. An increase in BH[≥] 2 mm from baseline was defined as pathological. ResultsTransection of the A2 strut CT increased BH by 3.1 mm, exceeding the pathological billowing threshold by 1.1 mm (padj = 0.003). CH decreased by 0.6 mm (padj = 0.003), whereas CA showed no significant change compared with baseline. Subsequent transection of all secondary CT further increased BH to 4.8 mm relative to baseline, corresponding to 2.8 mm above the billowing threshold (padj = 0.003). CH did not differ significantly, while CA decreased by 0.35 cm2 compared with baseline (padj = 0.029). All values represent medians. ConclusionSecondary CT play a critical role in stabilizing MV leaflet geometry. Their transection resulted in increased leaflet billowing and reduced coaptation metrics associated with unfavorable MV repair outcomes. Preservation or reconstruction of secondary CT may therefore be an important consideration in MV repair strategies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.