Back

Safety of Tenecteplase in Pediatric Arterial Ischemic Stroke

Lee, S.; International Pediatric Stroke Study, ; Sun, L. R.; Pediatric Neurocritical Care Research Group, ; Lee-Eng, J.; Barry, D.; Wilson, J. L.; Harrar, D. B.; Torres, M.; Galardi, M. M.; Hassanein, S. M.; Barry, M. M.; Rivkin, M. J.; Guilliams, K.; Amlie-Lefond, C.

2026-07-22 neurology
10.64898/2026.07.20.26358531 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Recent AHA guidelines recommend the use of IV Tenecteplase (TNK) in adult stroke patients, but there is minimal safety and dosing data on TNK in pediatric patients. We performed a safety surveillance study aiming to evaluate risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in children who received TNK for suspected acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Methods: This was a prospective observational cohort surveillance study analyzing responses from a monthly email survey sent to members of two large international pediatric stroke and neurocritical care research consortia querying recent use of TNK in children. Limited demographic, clinical, and outcome data were collected. A Bayesian beta-binomial model for risk of symptomatic ICH with IV TNK was fit using a prior distribution based on the risk level in adults. Results: Between February 2023-June 2026, 44 children received TNK for suspected AIS. Most patients (n=37, 84.1%) were adolescents; no children under 5 received TNK. Twelve patients (27.3%) were ultimately diagnosed with a stroke mimic. Symptomatic ICH was not reported in any children who received IV TNK; 3 had asymptomatic ICH on follow-up imaging. One patient received intra-arterial TNK and experienced symptomatic ICH. No other major bleeding events were reported. Conclusions: IV TNK is being administered to pediatric patients with suspected stroke in clinical practice, and may be safe in older children with AIS. Rigorous prospective studies are needed to better assess risk and outcomes in this unique population.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.