Safety of Tenecteplase in Pediatric Arterial Ischemic Stroke
Lee, S.; International Pediatric Stroke Study, ; Sun, L. R.; Pediatric Neurocritical Care Research Group, ; Lee-Eng, J.; Barry, D.; Wilson, J. L.; Harrar, D. B.; Torres, M.; Galardi, M. M.; Hassanein, S. M.; Barry, M. M.; Rivkin, M. J.; Guilliams, K.; Amlie-Lefond, C.
Show abstract
Background: Recent AHA guidelines recommend the use of IV Tenecteplase (TNK) in adult stroke patients, but there is minimal safety and dosing data on TNK in pediatric patients. We performed a safety surveillance study aiming to evaluate risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in children who received TNK for suspected acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Methods: This was a prospective observational cohort surveillance study analyzing responses from a monthly email survey sent to members of two large international pediatric stroke and neurocritical care research consortia querying recent use of TNK in children. Limited demographic, clinical, and outcome data were collected. A Bayesian beta-binomial model for risk of symptomatic ICH with IV TNK was fit using a prior distribution based on the risk level in adults. Results: Between February 2023-June 2026, 44 children received TNK for suspected AIS. Most patients (n=37, 84.1%) were adolescents; no children under 5 received TNK. Twelve patients (27.3%) were ultimately diagnosed with a stroke mimic. Symptomatic ICH was not reported in any children who received IV TNK; 3 had asymptomatic ICH on follow-up imaging. One patient received intra-arterial TNK and experienced symptomatic ICH. No other major bleeding events were reported. Conclusions: IV TNK is being administered to pediatric patients with suspected stroke in clinical practice, and may be safe in older children with AIS. Rigorous prospective studies are needed to better assess risk and outcomes in this unique population.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Prospective Observational Cohort Study Of Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase In Routine Clinical Practice 97%
- Effect of Time to Thrombolysis on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated with Tenecteplase Compared to Alteplase: Analysis from the AcT Randomized Controlled Trial 96%
- Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes after Reversal of Subtherapeutic Warfarin: Analysis of Data from GWTG-Stroke 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prehospital triage of intracranial hemorrhage and anterior large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke: the value of the rapid arterial occlusion evalution 96%
- Adjunctive Intra-arterial Urokinase after Successful Endovascular Thrombectomy in Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke (POST-UK): Study protocol of a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial 95%
- Large Core Thrombectomy: Feasibility Of Simplified Protocol In Resource-Limited Settings 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of Fludrocortisone on the Outcomes of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients: A Retrospective Analysis 95%
- Modified Rankin Scale Disability Status at Day 4 Poststroke is an Informative Predictor of Long-Term Day 90 Outcome 95%
- Usage of Mineralocorticoids and Isotonic Crystalloids in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients in the United States 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Short-term Functional Outcomes of Patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage in the Native and Expatriate Population 94%
- Factors Associated with Stroke after COVID-19 Vaccination: A Statewide Analysis 94%
- Automated Identification of Thrombectomy Amenable Vessel Occlusion on Computed Tomography Angiography using Deep Learning 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 Infection Is Associated with Poor Outcomes in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage 95%
- Tenecteplase 0.4 mg/kg in moderate and severe acute ischemic stroke: A pooled analysis of NOR-TEST & NOR-TEST 2A 95%
- Disparities in Access to Vascular Stroke Imaging and Carotid Revascularization: A Population Study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.