Back

Human in vivo immunology of tuberculosis is not affected by sex dimorphism.

Jiang, J.; Greenan-Barrett, J.; Gupta, R. K.; Noursadeghi, M.; Turner, C. T.

2026-07-21 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.07.20.26358462 medRxiv
Show abstract

Males incur greater risk of tuberculosis (TB) than females, but the contribution of sex-associated immune differences remains unclear. We addressed this using sex-stratified transcriptomic analyses across four independent studies spanning active pulmonary TB, subclinical TB and latent infection, in peripheral blood, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and by using the tuberculin skin test (TST) as a standardised in vivo antigenic challenge. In blood of active TB patients, expression of TNF- and type I interferon-regulated signatures, genome-wide gene expression, and performance of leading host-response biomarkers of TB were comparable between sexes. Similarly, blood transcriptomic biomarkers showed no meaningful sex-related differences for predicting asymptomatic or incident TB. In the TST of people with latent infection, bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing identified only limited differences, largely restricted to sex chromosome-linked transcripts, with no consistent evidence of dimorphism in immune-regulated pathways. Single-cell RNA sequencing of BAL samples identified reduced abundance of B cells in male TB patients, with gene expression differences again largely restricted to sex chromosome-linked transcripts. These findings suggest that canonical immune responses associated with TB are broadly similar between the sexes, and that increased TB risk among males more likely reflects differential exposure rather than intrinsic immunological susceptibility.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 7%
21.4%
2
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.1%
3
Thorax
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
4
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.7%
6
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.7%
7
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
Science Immunology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.1%
9
European Respiratory Journal
59 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 20%
2.6%
11
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.9%
12
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.9%
13
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.7%
14
Journal of Infection
78 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
16
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
18
Nature Microbiology
155 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
20
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.6%
21
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
22
Mucosal Immunology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
23
Nature Immunology
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
24
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
25
Immunity
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
26
The Lancet Microbe
44 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
27
The Journal of Immunology
166 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
28
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
29
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
30
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%