Back

The mental health of farm wives

May, S.; Crossley, R. M.

2026-07-21 occupational and environmental health
10.64898/2026.07.20.26358460 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objectives: Research on mental health in agriculture has increased in recent years; however, it remains largely focused on farmers themselves and is predominantly male-oriented. The mental health of farm wives and partners, many of whom play integral roles in farm operations, business management, and family life, remains difficult to characterise. This study therefore aims to explore the prevalence and causes of mental health challenges among farm wives and partners, and to investigate their use of, and barriers to, mental health support services. Methods: Quantitative data was collected using over 450 structured questionnaire responses that assessed mental health prevalence, contributing stressors and support service utilisation. Results: Findings indicate that there is a high prevalence of mental ill health amongst farm wives, seemingly due to industry stressors and support role overwhelm. Interpersonal relationships played a significant role in the types of mental distress experienced and highlighted the toll that farm life can take on farm wives' social and emotional connections. Despite a range of formal and informal support services being available, and effective when used, significant barriers to accessing these services were identified, including both practical difficulties and self-stigmatisation due to cultural beliefs. Conclusions: Farm wives and partners experience substantial mental health burdens linked to their diverse and often underrecognized roles within agricultural systems. In future, targeted interventions are needed to reduce stigma, improve service accessibility, and recognize women's contributions within farm enterprises. Further research and dedicated investment are also essential to better understand and help improve the mental health of this overlooked population within agricultural industries.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 3%
34.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 8%
7.5%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.5%
4
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.0%
6
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
7
Archives of Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
8
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
9
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
10
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
11
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
12
Health & Place
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
13
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
14
BMC Research Notes
33 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
15
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
16
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
17
BJPsych Open
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
18
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Global Health Action
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Phytopathology®
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
Epidemiology and Infection
89 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Journal of Occupational Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
25
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%