Differential response to deep brain stimulation in harm-avoidant vs. disgust subtypes of obsessive-compulsive disorder
Hamre, T.; Kutcher, T.; Hanish, R.; Soubra, S.; Bentley, H.; Mansourian, K.; Nitcheu, G.; Belavadi, V.; Chamarthi, S.; Jourahmad, Z.; Hasen, M.; Giridharan, N.; Heilbronner, S. R.; Storch, E. A.; Goodman, W. K.; Provenza, N. R.; Sheth, S. A.
Show abstract
Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising intervention for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) refractory to conventional therapies. However, preoperative factors that reliably predict treatment response are not well established. Among patients with contamination OCD, some are concerned with substances potentially causing harm to themselves or others ("harm-avoidant"), while others are viscerally repulsed by them ("disgust"). Disgust-oriented OCD is associated with attenuated psychotherapy outcomes; relationship with DBS outcome has yet to be examined. Here, we compare clinical outcomes following DBS between harm-avoidant and disgust OCD subtypes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 14 contamination OCD patients (7 female, 7 male) undergoing DBS between 2019 and 2024 and categorized them as harm-avoidant or disgust based on clinical features. We assessed demographics and Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale-Second Edition (Y-BOCS-II) scores preoperatively and longitudinally. Results: Among 14 patients with contamination OCD, the harm-avoidant (n=10) and disgust (n=4) groups had similar demographic characteristics and baseline Y-BOCS-II scores (harm-avoidant: 40.4 +/- 4.2, disgust: 40.0 +/- 6.9, p=0.92, Welch's t-test). At the latest follow-up, harm-avoidant patients achieved significantly lower Y-BOCS-II scores (harm-avoidant: 13.8 +/- 11.1, disgust: 30.5 +/- 3.1; p=0.001, Welch's t-test). Nine of ten harm-avoidant patients achieved response status (>=35% score reduction) compared to only one of four disgust patients (p=0.04, Fisher's exact test). Conclusions: Disgust OCD patients experienced attenuated improvement following DBS compared to harm-avoidant OCD patients. If confirmed in larger cohorts, these findings could motivate preoperative phenotypic stratification, inform decision-making about DBS candidacy, and guide alternative therapeutic strategies for disgust patients.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict cognitive behavioral therapy outcome in obsessive-compulsive disorder using clinical and neuroimaging data 93%
- Electroconvulsive therapy effects on anhedonia and reward circuitry anatomy: a dimensional structural neuroimaging approach 92%
- Stereo-Encephalography-Guided Multi Lead Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Refractory Obsessive Compulsive Disorder - Study Design and Individualized Surgical Targeting Approach 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Aberrant preparation of hand movement in schizophrenia spectrum disorder: An fMRI study 89%
- Functional connectivity of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex predicts cocaine relapse 88%
- Information processing speed modulation by electrical brain stimulation in multiple sclerosis: Towards individually-tailored protocols 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Randomised, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial of Deep Brain Stimulation of the Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis for Treatment-Resistant Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder 94%
- Targeting the prefrontal-supplementary motor network in obsessive-compulsive disorder with intensified electrical stimulation in two dosages: A randomized, controlled trial 93%
- White Matter Microstructure and its Relation to Clinical Features of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Findings from the ENIGMA OCD Working Group 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.