Development of Audiovisual Integration in Beginning Readers: A Longitudinal fMRI Study
Braverman-Jaiven, D.; Farah, R.; Kraus, D.; Zehngut, O.; Michaeli, T.; Carmel, R.; Elor, A.; Shapira-Rootman, M.; Skeide, M. A.; Finnemann, J.; Horowitz-Kraus, T.
Show abstract
Acquiring reading proficiency, unlike spoken language, requires the brain to engage several specialized neural systems to map visual symbols (letters) to their corresponding phonological sounds (audiovisual integration), laying the foundation for fluent reading. This study investigates the neural and behavioral trajectory of developing audiovisual (AV) integration during the first year of learning to read. Thirty-two healthy Hebrew-speaking first-grade children were assessed at 3 time points across the school year: beginning, middle, and end of first grade. Participants underwent behavioral testing and brain fMRI scans while performing a block-design fMRI task involving AV matching or non-matching letters and sounds. Together with improvement in behavioral test scores related to general abilities, working memory, cognitive flexibility, and phonemic abilities, a Drift Diffusion Modeling (DDM) analysis of the accuracy and reaction time across sessions suggested faster and more efficient responses as the year progressed. fMRI results showed a significant increase in activation, from the beginning to the end of the first grade, in the left superior temporal gyrus (STG), frontal cortices and parietotemporal cortices, with a shift towards left-lateralization in the fusiform gyrus at the end of the year. These findings point towards the second half of the first grade as the time window for neural specialization and lateralization to phonological and orthographic information. A significant positive correlation between the fusiform gyrus activation and naming objects and colors scores across all sessions links this neural specialization to cognitive flexibility behavioral skills. Key pointsO_LISignificant increase, predominantly between the middle and end of the first grade, in activation in fusiform, left superior temporal, frontal, and parietotemporal cortices across the first grade. C_LIO_LISignificant left lateralization in the fusiform gyrus at the end of first grade. C_LIO_LIPositive correlation between naming skills and a bilateral fusiform gyrus activation throughout the first grade. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- White matter in infancy is prospectively associated with language outcome in kindergarten 96%
- The optic radiations and reading development: a longitudinal study of children born term and preterm 96%
- Growing Minds, Integrating Senses: Neural and Computational Insights into Age-related Changes in Audio-Visual and Tactile-Visual Learning in Children 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Disentangling Age and Schooling Effects on Inhibitory Control Development: An fNIRS Investigation 96%
- Functional brain adaptations during speech processing in 4-month-old bilingual infants 95%
- Progress in elementary school reading linked to growthof cortical responses to familiar letter combinationswithin visual word forms 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural bases of reading fluency: A systematic review and meta-analysis 97%
- White matter connectivity in uncinate fasciculus accounts for visual attention span in developmental dyslexia 96%
- The semantic control network mediates the relationship between symbolic numerical order processing and arithmetic performance in children 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Adaptive compensation of arcuate fasciculus lateralization in developmental dyslexia 96%
- Development of attention networks from childhood to young adulthood: A study of performance, intraindividual variability and cortical thickness 96%
- Decoding the content of working memory in school-aged children 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.