State-dependent non-identifiability of the reproduction number under adaptive behavior: an empirical characterization from COVID-19 mobility
Sanchez, F.
Show abstract
The basic reproduction number R0 confounds pathogen biology with adaptive human contact behavior. Earlier epidemiological--economic theory predicted a forward-looking behavioral contact response but could not test it in the absence of appropriate behavioral data. Using directly measured mobility as an observable proxy for contact, we (i) estimate the behavioral response function directly from data; (ii) show that the biology/behavior decomposition and hence the behavioral correction to R0 is not identified from an epidemic trajectory, the apparent constant-contact R0 being one endpoint of an observational-equivalence class that fits the factual curve identically yet diverges under counterfactual; and (iii) characterize that divergence ("what R0 deletes") as state-dependent, unimodal in counterfactual severity and vanishing when behavior saturates. We then show that, across US jurisdictions, the correction is empirically bounded because risk-responsiveness and behavioral non-saturation are confounded (r=-0.57, n=51): where behavior could compensate, it was already maximal, and where it was not maximal it did not respond. What R0 deletes is thus real and structurally characterizable yet empirically modest here, for reasons the framework itself supplies.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A stochastic epidemiological model to estimate the size of an outbreak at the first case identification 95%
- Coupled environmental and demographic fluctuations shape the evolution of cooperative antimicrobial resistance 94%
- Role of high-dose exposure in transmission hot zones as a driver of SARS-CoV2 dynamics 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.