Back

Tumor-Colonizing Microbiota Distinguish Early- and Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer in a Hispanic/Latino Patient Cohort

Manjarrez, S.; Diaz, F. C.; Carranza, F. G.; Waldrup, B.; Ninova, M.; Velazquez-Villarreal, E.

2026-07-21 oncology
10.64898/2026.07.19.26358429 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is increasing globally, particularly among Hispanic/Latino (H/L) populations, yet the contribution of tumor-colonizing microbiota to age-associated colorectal cancer (CRC) biology remains poorly understood. Most microbiome studies have focused on fecal communities or non-Hispanic populations, leaving the intratumoral microbial landscape of H/L patients largely unexplored. Methods: We performed an exploratory characterization of tumor-colonizing microbiota using whole-exome sequencing (WES) data from four primary colorectal tumors obtained from H/L patients treated at City of Hope, including two EOCRC (<50 years) and two late-onset colorectal cancer (LOCRC; [&ge;]50 years) cases. Following removal of host-derived sequences, microbial taxonomic profiling was conducted at the family, genus, and species levels, and microbial metabolic pathways were inferred. Clinical and pathological data were integrated to evaluate age-associated differences in microbial composition and predicted function. Results: Family-, genus-, and species-level analyses consistently demonstrated greater microbial diversity in LOCRC than EOCRC. LOCRC contained more than twice the number of unique bacterial families, nearly three times as many unique genera, and more than twice as many unique bacterial species. A conserved core microbiota, including Fusobacteriaceae, Prevotellaceae, Fusobacterium, and Prevotella, was identified across both age groups, whereas LOCRC was enriched in CRC-associated taxa including Fusobacterium nucleatum, Bacteroides fragilis, Parvimonas micra, Porphyromonas asaccharolytica, and Dialister pneumosintes. Species-level analyses revealed only a single shared bacterial species between EOCRC and LOCRC, indicating progressive microbial divergence with increasing taxonomic resolution. In contrast, functional profiling identified 11 predicted microbial metabolic pathways, of which nine were shared between age groups, two were unique to EOCRC, and none were exclusive to LOCRC. Core metabolic pathways involved in energy metabolism, amino acid biosynthesis, phospholipid metabolism, and central carbon metabolism exhibited comparable abundance across both groups, demonstrating substantial functional conservation despite pronounced taxonomic differences. Conclusions: Tumor-colonizing microbiota differ markedly between EOCRC and LOCRC in H/L patients, with late-onset tumors exhibiting substantially greater microbial richness and taxonomic complexity. Despite these compositional differences, microbial metabolic functions remain largely conserved, supporting the concept of functional redundancy within the colorectal tumor microenvironment (TME). Although exploratory, this proof-of-concept study provides one of the first characterizations of intratumoral microbiota in H/L EOCRC and establishes a foundation for larger multi-omics investigations aimed at identifying microbiome-based biomarkers and therapeutic targets for precision oncology.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Microbiome
154 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.2%
2
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.3%
3
Gut Microbes
78 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 26%
5.6%
5
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
5.6%
6
Cancer Cell
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.6%
7
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.5%
9
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
58 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
10
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
11
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.3%
14
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.1%
17
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
18
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.1%
20
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
Gut
40 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
22
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
24
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
25
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.9%
27
OncoImmunology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
28
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
29
BMC Microbiology
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%