Back

Task-sharing echocardiographic screening for rheumatic heart disease with community health workers in First Nations Australian communities: implementation outcomes and realist evaluation from the NEARER SCAN study

Jones, B.; Mitchell, A.; Marangou, J.; Yan, J.; Cannon, J.; Williamson, J. M.; Law, L.; Kaethner, A.; Bailey, M.; Collins, R.; Mayo, L.; Wade, V.; Fitzsimmons, D.; Paterson, A.; Remenyi, B.; Ralph, A. P.; Wheaton, G.; Haynes, E.; Katzenellenbogen, J. M.; Howard, N. J.; Riley, P.; Brown, K.; Gatti, J.; Lockyer, S.; Pears, C.; Stewart, M.; Rossingh, B.; Daniels, C.; Fernandes, A. M.; Hardefeldt, H.; O Brien, J.; Hillis, G. S.; Engelman, D.; Brown, A.; Steer, A. C.; Carapetis, J.; English, M.; Nagraj, S.; Francis, J. R.

2026-07-21 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.07.18.26358403 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) remains a major cause of premature death in low- and middle-income countries and First Nations communities. Early detection and management can prevent progression, but requires echocardiography, which is limited in high-burden settings. Task-sharing echocardiographic screening is an accessible, evidence-based approach but implementation remains unclear. Methods: We conducted a prospective implementation evaluation of a co-designed task-sharing screening programme across five remote First Nations Australian communities between May 2023 and November 2025. Predominantly community health workers (CHWs), alongside nurses and doctors, were trained to scan using handheld devices with off-site cardiologist interpretation. We assessed implementation outcomes and used a realist evaluation to explore how context shaped CHWs ability to complete training and embed screening into routine work. Data included scanning activity, surveys, costing, interviews, focus groups, and field notes. Findings: We trained 32 staff (21 CHWs, 8 nurses, 3 doctors) to scan across five sites. Scanning frequency was lower and more variable than anticipated: 360 scans (including training and post-certification) of 5 - 20 year olds over 14 months, with site-level coverage of 3 - 85%. Fidelity was limited by device unavailability, charging problems, and delays in uploads and reviews. Set-up and training cost A$51,903 per site, plus A$9,858/year in implementation support. Screening was easier for CHWs to embed when the legitimacy of their role as a scanner was communicated, but harder when invisible work outweighed opportunities to scan. Interpretation: Future implementation will require efforts to legitimise CHWs scanning and support invisible work. Event-based screening offers a promising complementary strategy. Scale-up requires policy support. Funding: This research was funded by the Australian Medical Research Futures Fund Cardiovascular Health Mission (GNT2015869), in addition to philanthropic donations from Medtronic Australasia, Edwards Life Sciences and the Rotary Club of Kiama. Hand-held devices (Philips Lumify, USA) were donated by Humpty Dumpty Foundation and East Timor Hearts Fund.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 1%
13.3%
2
Open Heart
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.8%
4
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.8%
5
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.6%
7
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
9
BJGP Open
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
10
BMJ
51 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
11
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
12
DIGITAL HEALTH
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
13
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
British Journal of General Practice
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
18
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
19
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
21
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
JMIR Research Protocols
21 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
23
Trials
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
24
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
26
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
27
Pulmonary Circulation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
28
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
30
European Respiratory Journal
59 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%