Back

Gradient-guided adapter merging for neuroimaging vision-language models

Bit, S.; Guney, O. B.; Jia, S.; Kolachalama, V. B.

2026-07-21 health informatics
10.64898/2026.07.18.26358397 medRxiv
Show abstract

Automated interpretation of neuroimaging studies requires simultaneous assessment of multiple imaging evidence variables, each tied to distinct anatomical structures. Vision-language models (VLMs) offer a unified framework for multi-task analysis, but adapting pre-trained VLMs remains challenging. Full fine-tuning is computationally prohibitive, and joint multi-task training requires simultaneous access to all task data, which is often infeasible in clinical settings. Although model merging enables multi-task composition without joint re-training, existing methods focus on post-hoc algorithms with limited extension to VLMs and minimal application to neuroimaging. Here, we present GRadient-guided Adapter Merging (GRAM), a layer-selective low-rank adaptation (LoRA)-based fine-tuning and merging framework for multi-task neuroimaging visual question-answering (VQA). GRAM uses a gradient ratio that contrasts class-specific gradients to identify task-discriminative layers, and applies subspace-constrained projected gradient descent to restrict LoRA updates to directions consistent with the geometry of the pre-trained model. We leveraged a structured VQA benchmark, developed from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) dataset, that pairs multi-sequence brain MRI studies with question-answer pairs across clinically relevant imaging evidence variables. Experiments on the VQA benchmark showed that GRAM outperformed or matched all-layer LoRA fine-tuning and a standard merging baseline while reducing inter-task interference during merging, and approached or surpassed the performance of joint multi-task training without joint re-training.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.