Spatially unitized associations occupy an intermediate position along the item-to-association continuum in older adults
Seo, M. S.; Becker, A.; Huang, L.-h. H.; Overman, A. A.; Dennis, N. A.
Show abstract
Older adults show disproportionate impairments in associative memory relative to memory for individual items. Unitization, the process by which discrete elements are encoded as a single integrated representation, has been proposed to mitigate this deficit by reducing reliance on hippocampal binding and shifting processing toward perirhinal cortex-mediated item-based encoding. However, most prior work has not included a single item baseline, leaving unclear whether unitized associations are truly processed like items. Here, we investigated whether spatial proximity supports associative memory in older adults and how this benefit is reflected in medial temporal lobe (MTL) encoding activity. Participants encoded unrelated object pairs presented either proximally (spatially integrated) or distally (spatially separated), alongside a single item condition. Behaviorally, older adults showed better memory for proximal than distal pairs, though performance remained below that of single items. Neurally, MTL activity scaled with associative demand, with hippocampal activity increasing and perirhinal activity decreasing as demand increased. Results further revealed an anterior-posterior MTL dissociation, with proximal pairs sharing neural properties with both single items and distal pairs without uniquely recruiting either. Furthermore, hippocampal patterns reliably distinguished item from associative encoding, and the parahippocampal cortex discriminated all three conditions, indicating that the item-associative structure of the MTL was preserved in aging. Together, these findings suggest that proximal pairs occupy an intermediate position between item and associative representations within an intact MTL architecture, and that spatial proximity benefits associative memory in older adults by partially, but not fully, shifting associative demands toward item-based processing. HighlightsO_LISpatial proximity improved associative memory in older adults. C_LIO_LIHippocampal and PRC activity scaled with associative binding demands. C_LIO_LISpatially unitized associations fell between single items and distal associations in MTL encoding activity. C_LIO_LIMTL item-association functional structure was preserved in older adults. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of aging on successful object encoding:Enhanced semantic representations compensate for impaired visual representations 98%
- Reward enhances memory via age-varying online and offline neural mechanisms across development 98%
- Progression from feature-specific brain activity to hippocampal binding during episodic encoding 98%
Similar papers in this journal
- fMRI signals of pattern separation in the neocortex and hippocampus to non-meaningful objects and their spatial location 98%
- Broad Brain Networks Support Curiosity-Motivated Incidental Learning Of Naturalistic Dynamic Stimuli With And Without Monetary Incentives 97%
- Multiple neural pathways to successful visual short-term memory across the adult lifespan 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Proximity to Boundaries Reveals Spatial Context Representation in Human Hippocampal CA1 97%
- Recollection-related hippocampal fMRI effects predict longitudinal memory change in healthy older adults 97%
- Item recognition and lure discrimination in younger and older adults are supported by alpha/beta desynchronization 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A structure-function substrate of memory for spatial configurations in medial and lateral temporal cortices 97%
- The locus of recognition memory signals in human cortex depends on the complexity of the memory representations 97%
- Patterns of retrieval-related cortico-striatal connectivity are stable across the adult lifespan 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.