Back

Distinct nigral and brainstem pathology markers map onto separable subthalamic electrophysiological signatures in Parkinson's disease

Delgado-Sanchez, A.; Andrews, L.; Hayton, P. J.; Craig, C.; Macerollo, A.; Cortes-Gutierrez, J.; Martin, S.; Somervail, R.; Azimi, A.; Muller, M. L.; Parkes, L.; Haroon, H.; Bergamino, M.; Kotz, S. A.; Silverdale, M.; Trujillo-Barreto, N.; Ray, N.

2026-07-22 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.17.739149 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Subthalamic local field potentials (LFPs) are increasingly used as physiomarkers of the symptomatic state in Parkinsons disease, but their relationship to the underlying neurodegenerative pathology remains unclear. Here, we combined OFF-medication subthalamic LFP recordings with quantitative MRI markers of nigral and brainstem pathology in 33 people with Parkinsons disease. Distinct pathological markers mapped onto dissociable electrophysiological components. Substantia nigra pars compacta susceptibility was associated with increased occupancy, duration and rate of low-{beta} bursts, whereas nigral free water was associated with greater low-frequency aperiodic offset and a steeper slope. Pedunculopontine nucleus free-water- corrected axial diffusivity was selectively associated with high-frequency aperiodic activity, and this relationship strengthened with increasing nigral susceptibility, consistent with dopaminergic-state- dependent influences of extranigral pathology on subthalamic physiology. Only low-frequency aperiodic offset was also associated with contralateral bradykinesia. These findings indicate that the subthalamic LFP is not a unitary readout of dopamine loss or motor state, but an integrated physiological signal in which pathology across interconnected systems is expressed through separable oscillatory and aperiodic components. Chronically implanted devices may therefore provide physiological readouts of underlying disease biology alongside control signals for adaptive therapy.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.