Back

Excitatory delay-coupling explains in-phase and antiphase functional connectivity

Omurtag, A.; Dragomir, A.; Crofts, J.; Lytton, W. W.

2026-07-19 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.17.739148 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Coordinated oscillatory activity between brain regions underpins cognition, yet the phase relationships governing this coordination remain poorly understood. Using scalp EEG from 31 participants performing a motor learning task, we show that inter-site phase clustering occurs predominantly at in-phase or antiphase relationships, with the transition between them governed by conduction delay. Homologous interhemispheric pairs remain in-phase despite long distances, consistent with faster callosal conduction. A minimal model of two delay-coupled excitatory populations reproduces these features without parameter tuning; stability analysis shows that in-phase and antiphase oscillations arise from competing instabilities, with delay determining which dominates. Task performance shifts a frontoparietal network toward in-phase connectivity, a modulation captured by the Phase Relationship Index (PRI) but missed by conventional clustering metrics. Preliminary evidence from independent datasets suggests these patterns generalise. These findings challenge the assumption that zero-lag connectivity reflects volume conduction, offer a mechanistic account linking conduction delay to phase organisation, and introduce PRI as a metric sensitive to functionally relevant connectivity changes invisible to existing measures.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.