Posterior insula oscillations are not modulated by changes in perceived intensity: Evidence from human intracerebral EEG
Leu, C.; Boutachkourt, A.; Ferrao Santos, S.; Fierain, A.; Joris, V.; Finet, P.; Liberati, G.
Show abstract
The human insular cortex is involved in a multitude of processes essential for survival, but its precise role in pain perception remains debated. While it has been shown that ongoing oscillatory activity in the posterior insula is preferentially modulated by thermonociceptive input, it is unclear whether these modulations are functionally related to changes in pain perception. To assess this link, neural responses to sustained periodic thermonociceptive and non-nociceptive vibrotactile stimulation delivered at a frequency of 0.2 Hz were measured using intracerebral electrode contacts located in the anterior (n=63) and posterior (n=37) insular cortices of 10 patients undergoing presurgical evaluation for focal epilepsy. An arithmetic task was employed concomitant to the stimulation, aiming to reduce participants perceived intensity while leaving the physical stimulation parameters unchanged. A frequency-tagging analysis approach was used to assess the modulation of the ongoing neural oscillations. As expected, the perception of the stimulation was significantly reduced during the arithmetic task to a similar extent in both modalities. Yet, no congruent reduction in the frequency-tagged oscillatory responses was found in the posterior insula during distraction, for either of the modalities. On the contrary, during distraction, vibrotactile stimulation elicited larger responses in the anterior insula. These findings suggest that top-down modulation via distraction differentially affects anterior insula responses to innocuous vibrotactile input, while thermonociceptive processing appears to involve additional neural systems during distraction that are not equivalently engaged by vibrotactile stimulation.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Working memory enhancement using real-time phase-tuned transcranial alternating current stimulation 96%
- Decomposing the effects of alpha-tACS on brain oscillations and aperiodic 1/f activity 96%
- Phase-specific manipulation of neural oscillatory activity by transcranial alternating current stimulation 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural effects of TMS trains on the human prefrontal cortex 96%
- Causal modulation of right fronto-parietal phase synchrony with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation during a conscious visual detection task 96%
- Changes in cross-frequency coupling following closed-loop auditory stimulation in non-rapid eye movement sleep 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Stimulation Artifact Source Separation (SASS) for assessing electric brain oscillations during transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) 96%
- Cortical response variability is driven by local excitability changes with somatotopic organization 96%
- Early beta oscillations in multisensory association areas underlie crossmodal performance enhancement 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Phase-synchronized 40Hz tACS and iTBS effects on gamma oscillations 96%
- Characterising the contribution of auditory and somatosensory inputs to TMS-evoked potentials following stimulation of prefrontal, premotor and parietal cortex 96%
- Distinct and complementary mechanisms of oscillatory and aperiodic alpha activity in visuospatial attention 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.