Defining the molecular interaction between influenza hemagglutinin and MHC-II
Dadonaite, B.; Dosey, A.; Ahn, J. J.; Yu, T. C.; Sunshine, S. A.; Farrell, A. G.; King, N. P.; Bloom, J. D.
Show abstract
The hemagglutinin (HA) of some influenza viruses can interact with major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC-II), but how these proteins interact is unclear. Here we demonstrate that diverse H5 HAs can use MHC-II to enter cells, with avian MHC-II enabling more efficient entry than human MHC-II for most H5 HAs. To define the molecular interface, we use pseudovirus deep mutational scanning to measure how mutations to H5 HA affect its interaction with tufted duck MHC-II, and identify mutations that restrict HA to exclusively MHC-II or sialic acid receptors. We leverage identification of H5 HA mutations that increase binding to tufted duck MHC-II to determine a 4.8 [A] cryo-EM model of the complex. To support the structural model, we measure how all mutations to tufted duck MHC-II affect its interaction with H5 HA, and find the alpha chain is the dominant determinant but beta chain sites near the peptide-binding groove also contribute. To generalize these findings, we use deep mutational scanning to show that a H7 HA interacts with MHC-II similarly to H5 HA. Finally, we show that H1, H2, H3, and H9 HAs interact with avian or human MHC-II, although interactions vary among strains that evolved in different hosts.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evolution of enhanced innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants 98%
- The cut site specificity of the influenza A virus endoribonuclease PA-X allows it to discriminate between host and viral mRNAs 98%
- Molecular model of a bacterial flagellar motor in situ reveals a "parts-list" of protein adaptations to increase torque 97%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.