Back

Expectation Shapes Neural Preparation for AI-generated and Real Image Processing: Evidence from EEG

Chen, Y.; Eiserbeck, A.; Maier, M.; Klotzsche, F.; Hofmann, S. M.; Baum, J.; Nierula, B.; Hilsmann, A.; Bosse, S.; Villringer, A.; Rahman, R. A.; Gaebler, M.; Nikulin, V.

2026-07-17 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.17.738592 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AbstractAI-generated images, videos, and news have become an inseparable part of daily life, leading to increasing skepticism toward online information. Understanding how expectations about the presence of AI-generated content influence perception is crucial for elucidating the underlying neural mechanisms and facilitating the generation of naturalistic avatars. In this study, we analyzed an existing EEG dataset (N = 29) in which participants viewed emotional facial photographs of only real individuals while being informed that upcoming faces were either real ("REAL") or AI-generated ("FAKE"). We examined pre-stimulus oscillatory activities in the one-second EEG interval before stimulus onset and found significantly lower alpha power when participants expected "FAKE" compared to "REAL" faces. This effect was region-specific, particularly in right occipito-parietal and temporo-parietal regions, as identified by both sensor- and source- level analyses. In addition, the modulation effect between pre-stimulus alpha activity and post-stimulus event-related potentials (ERPs) was measured. A significant correlation between changes in late positive potential (LPP) amplitudes and pre-stimulus alpha power was observed exclusively for "FAKE" smiling faces, consistent with our previous findings. These results suggest that AI-related expectations modulate neural preparatory states, with lower alpha activity presumably reflecting increased attentional demands for stimuli believed to be artificially generated. This study demonstrates that top-down beliefs systematically shape both pre- and post-stimulus neural dynamics, providing new insights into how cognitive expectations bias perceptual processing, with implications for understanding human-AI interaction and improving the design and evaluation of AI- generated content in real-world contexts.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.